Skip to main content

Recursion by Blake Crouch

Quite a good novel. Diverting and a fast read with a creative central theme dealing with the nature of memory, and what actually happens in our brains when an experience is "experienced."

The book also gets you thinking about how you might live your life if you had a chance to re-live it: what things you would do--or not do? And what would be the nature of your experience during that second go-around? Will you be grateful to live it again? Would it teach you that you aren't grateful enough right now, in this go-around of your life?

Speaking of gratitude: I'm grateful this writer doesn't have the flouncing, gamma "I've deliberately inserted something witty here my dear reader, can't you see how funny I am?" tone seen in certain modern sci-fi writers like John Scalzi or Andy Weir.

Finally, critics speak pejoratively about the Macguffin, an item or device used to move a story along--usually when it lacks momentum or direction of its own. The time travel used throughout Recursion is in some ways the mother of all Macguffins: just think what an author can do if he has time travel at his disposal: he can do anything he wants with the story, including giving the characters repeated do-overs! You can turn what's thought of as a literary crutch into your primary tool, if you're writer enough to get away with it. 


(speaking of recursion...)

PS: if you're looking for some new fiction sources, read the acknowledgments: you can mine it for quite a few potentially good writers. See for example Helen Smith, Amor Towles (author of A Gentleman in Moscow), F. Paul Wilson, Joe Hart and John Shaw.

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think