Skip to main content

Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir

Readable, cutesy scifi. Weir writes with the same constipated wittiness of John Scalzi, which unfortunately makes the book nowhere near as good as it sounds. 

All the characters are basically the same character, they all speak the same way, and "wow," "noted," "it's a thing!" and "or something" are standard dialog items. This author can tell a competent story but he can't (yet) produce interesting characters.

A reader looking for a significant recent sci-fi work (like Cixin Liu's The Three Body Problem) would be deeply disappointed with this novel.

There is one interesting MacGuffin-type device in this book worth mentioning: by giving his main character amnesia, the author has the magical ability to endow him with any technical skill or technical knowledge he needs: just narrate (or have the main character himself "realize") that he already knew it before. For example, if the main character needs to do a spacewalk, make him already highly trained at it, and then have the amnesiac character say to himself "I must have practiced this a lot." It's an interesting device that gives the author much more flexibility to deal with plotting problems, but it flattens the main character into a type of a Mary Sue (or "Competent Man") with superpowers.

More Posts

Hot, Flat and Crowded by Thomas Friedman

I've now read three of Thomas Friedman's books, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, The World Is Flat, and now, Hot, Flat, and Crowded. And Hot Flat and Crowded is--by far--the weakest book of the three. In fact, a cynic might consider it more of a brand extension than a book--a recycling of The World is Flat to include well-meaning and repetitive chapters on energy policy, the environment and global warming. And despite his earnest and palliative writing tone, Friedman's political message has become shrill, and that shrillness debases many of the potentially intriguing ideas and arguments he makes throughout the book. According to Friedman, everything is the Americans' fault. We're supposed to be leaders of the free world, yet we should only act with the consensus blessing of all the rest of the world's countries. We invaded Iraq, which was wrong. We invaded Afghanistan, which was sort of right, but we're making far too many mistakes there. We don't educat...

A Simple Rule for Getting Rid of Your Excess Books

If you read a lot of books like we do, perhaps you share our problem: Our home is gradually getting overrun by books. Piles of them. Sure, we've made resolutions to control the spread of our collection, like "no more buying books!" and "only get books out of the library!" We've tried these approaches, but unfortunately, not only do rules like these suck the fun out of life, they're also ineffective. The thing is, even though we do get most of our books out of the library, and we don't really make a practice of buying books, we somehow still seem to have more books than we know what to do with. And the piles seem to grow, slowly but surely, with every month and year. Earlier this year, however, we adopted a simple strategy to control our book creep, and it has worked so well for us that I decided to share it with you in this blog: For every new book you bring into your home, you must immediately remove two. It doesn't matter whether you donate th...

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s...