Skip to main content

Butterfield 8 by John O'Hara

Forgettable and quite honestly unpleasant 1930s-era novel about libertines in New York City. At least I hope it's forgettable, because I'd like to forget I read it. The plot and characters are nihilistic and the novel is dark. Not the kind of novel I'd recommend to brighten your day.

The story centers around a young, damaged woman who's into herself, who's both shallow and (unluckily for her) beautiful. She easily attracts men, everywhere, all the time, and her rampaging sex life even grosses her out (the book implies that she's slept with dozens and dozens of men, yet she's still in her early 20s--and remember, this is the 1930s). All the depredations, decadence and dramas she gets caught up in eventually catch up with her, but to the reader it's an empty story without even a proper ending. Imagine something like Truman Capote's Breakfast at Tiffany's with an irritating, unlikable Holly Golightly.

That said, the novel has some interesting proto-modernist structural elements: it opens with several scenelets where both the characters and the scenes themselves intersect and intertwine with each other. Also, buried in the novel there's an offhand self-reference to O'Hara's previous novel: two of the characters in Butterfield 8 look across a speakeasy and see a woman who looks just like someone from Appointment in Samara. You'd miss it entirely unless you'd just finished that other novel. These and other modernist elements make the novel seem like something written in the 1960s rather than 1935, but they don't make the novel redeemable enough to read.

Once again, you get a real taste for the libertinism of the 1920s and early 1930s, and after two John O'Hara novels in a row it certainly appears to be a pattern--but I won't be sticking around for any more of his novels to see if he can write beyond this theme.

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think