Skip to main content

Appointment in Samarra by John O'Hara

A 1934 novel set in the early Depression years, centered around a man who today we might describe as a high-functioning narcissist: a man filled with rage and self-absorption, constantly running scenes in his head about all the things he can't stand about the people around him.

The novel contextualizes an interesting hinge point in United States socio-cultural history, when the Depression had set in but hadn't yet irrevocably changed society away from Roaring '20s-era libertinism. You also get a sense of the everyday social divides of "normal" America in those days, the era's reflexive classism, sectarianism and antisemitism. The author has a gift for acerbic commentary about social status, comments that ring true regardless of era.

It's interesting to see how certain social differences back then seem laughable now. Take the Catholic/Protestant divide, a central element of conflict among characters in this novel. This specific conflict may have been significant then, but it seems pointless and silly today, since in today's era civilization has far larger conflicts on a far greater scale. Sectarian conflicts have moved up in phylum to Christian vs. Muslim; the class conflicts have gone from trivial class distinctions to an all-out war between elites and everyone else; and if that isn't enough we also are fighting a culture-wars conflict and a brewing global geopolitical power struggle. You look back at people bickering over the Catholic/Protestant divide and you just want to climb into the novel and shake people and show them what's really coming.

The title refers to an old fable about how you can't run from your destiny--in fact, even your attempt to run from it fulfills it. The main character of this book destroys his reputation and his life in a matter of a few short days, thanks to rage, poor judgment, far too much alcohol, and an unwillingness to ask forgiveness. 

This isn't a great novel, by some measures it's not even a good novel. I'd recommend it only to those interested in context for a prior Fourth Turning/Crisis-type era in history in order to better navigate the current era. 

Pair with:
How To Deal With Narcissists by Anonymous Conservative 

Notes: 
* "Tonight's dinner, as almost every guest was able to tell at a glance, was the club's two-fifty dinner. This was a club dinner dance, and all members were invited. At a dinner such as the Ammermanns', the hostess could arrange with the steward for the dollar-fifty (roast chicken), the two-dollar (roast turkey), or the two-fifty (filet mignon), and this had been the filet mignon dinner. The Armormands had just that much money, and their position in Gibbsville was just that certain and insecure, that they had to give the best of everything."

* There's an interesting pacing technique in this novel: the author uses a technique of changing from one character viewpoint to another via shorter and shorter minisegments during the last third of the book. It has the effect of artificially speeding up the pacing and tension. Interesting device.

Vocab:
Swindle sheet: an expense account
Sawbuck: a ten-dollar bill
Paresis: a condition of muscular weakness caused by nerve damage or disease; partial paralysis; also can mean brain inflammation in the later stages of syphilis, causing progressive dementia and paralysis.
Flivver: a cheap car or aircraft, especially one in bad condition. [Heh, today we'd use the word hoop-dee.]

More Posts

The Genealogy of Morals by Friedrich Nietzsche (trans. Francis Golffing)

Of the three essays of The Genealogy of Morals  I recommend the first two. Skim the third. Collectively, they are extremely useful reading for citizens of the West to see clearly the oligarchic power dynamics under which we live. Show me a modern Western nation-state where there isn't an increasing concentration of power among the elites--and a reduction in freedom for everyone else. You can't find one. Today we live in an increasingly neo-feudal system, where elites control more and more of the wealth, the actions, even the  thoughts  of the masses. Perhaps we should see the rare flowerings of genuine democratic freedom (6th century BC Athens, Republic-era Rome, and possibly pre-1913 USA ) for what they really are: extreme outliers, quickly replaced with tyranny. The first essay inverts the entire debate about morality, as Nietzsche nukes centuries of philosophical ethics by simply saying the powerful simply do what they do , and thus those things are good by defi...

The Fourth Turning is Here by Neil Howe

If you've read the original  The Fourth Turning , much of this book will be review. However, this book explains the Forth Turning framework more cogently and tightly than the original, so if you  haven't  read the original book, I recommend just reading this and skipping the original. You'll walk away with the same central ideas plus the author's additional new (and slightly-adjusted) conclusions. The most profound takeaway from the overall Fourth Turning paradigm is that it teaches you to remember your place in the grand scheme of things. Sadly, modernity teaches the exact opposite: it persuades us to think we humans are bigger than history, that we can ignore it, be oblivious to it, and yet not repeat it. Worst of all, modernity teaches us to believe we've somehow managed to defeat history with our SOYANCE!!! and tEcHNologY--ironically none of which we can understand, replicate or repair. These "modren" beliefs, as arrogant and wrong as they are, conflic...

Anatomy of the State by Murray Rothbard

Tight, concise discussion of what the State really is and what it really does, not what we would like it to be. Thanks to the recent pandemic response, most of us lost once and for all our delusive belief that governments are a force for good, a force for fairness and justice. In this short book, Murray Rothbard shows how the State--no matter how "limited" a government you might set up in the beginning--always, always abrogates its citizens' rights and freedoms. It's just a matter of time. We also come to understand why the State loves war. It loves it. It gives the State far more power. It provides an easy justification to abrogate still more freedoms. And of course those in the State apparatus who profit politically or economically from war never seem to send their own sons to fight it. An all-too-typical example: note how Benjamin Netanyahu's military-age son lives safely and luxuriously in Miami, his security paid for by Israeli taxpayers . The fourth chap...