Skip to main content

Appointment in Samarra by John O'Hara

A 1934 novel set in the early Depression years, centered around a man who today we might describe as a high-functioning narcissist: a man filled with rage and self-absorption, constantly running scenes in his head about all the things he can't stand about the people around him.

The novel contextualizes an interesting hinge point in United States socio-cultural history, when the Depression had set in but hadn't yet irrevocably changed society away from Roaring '20s-era libertinism. You also get a sense of the everyday social divides of "normal" America in those days, the era's reflexive classism, sectarianism and antisemitism. The author has a gift for acerbic commentary about social status, comments that ring true regardless of era.

It's interesting to see how certain social differences back then seem laughable now. Take the Catholic/Protestant divide, a central element of conflict among characters in this novel. This specific conflict may have been significant then, but it seems pointless and silly today, since in today's era civilization has far larger conflicts on a far greater scale. Sectarian conflicts have moved up in phylum to Christian vs. Muslim; the class conflicts have gone from trivial class distinctions to an all-out war between elites and everyone else; and if that isn't enough we also are fighting a culture-wars conflict and a brewing global geopolitical power struggle. You look back at people bickering over the Catholic/Protestant divide and you just want to climb into the novel and shake people and show them what's really coming.

The title refers to an old fable about how you can't run from your destiny--in fact, even your attempt to run from it fulfills it. The main character of this book destroys his reputation and his life in a matter of a few short days, thanks to rage, poor judgment, far too much alcohol, and an unwillingness to ask forgiveness. 

This isn't a great novel, by some measures it's not even a good novel. I'd recommend it only to those interested in context for a prior Fourth Turning/Crisis-type era in history in order to better navigate the current era. 

Pair with:
How To Deal With Narcissists by Anonymous Conservative 

Notes: 
* "Tonight's dinner, as almost every guest was able to tell at a glance, was the club's two-fifty dinner. This was a club dinner dance, and all members were invited. At a dinner such as the Ammermanns', the hostess could arrange with the steward for the dollar-fifty (roast chicken), the two-dollar (roast turkey), or the two-fifty (filet mignon), and this had been the filet mignon dinner. The Armormands had just that much money, and their position in Gibbsville was just that certain and insecure, that they had to give the best of everything."

* There's an interesting pacing technique in this novel: the author uses a technique of changing from one character viewpoint to another via shorter and shorter minisegments during the last third of the book. It has the effect of artificially speeding up the pacing and tension. Interesting device.

Vocab:
Swindle sheet: an expense account
Sawbuck: a ten-dollar bill
Paresis: a condition of muscular weakness caused by nerve damage or disease; partial paralysis; also can mean brain inflammation in the later stages of syphilis, causing progressive dementia and paralysis.
Flivver: a cheap car or aircraft, especially one in bad condition. [Heh, today we'd use the word hoop-dee.]

More Posts

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator by Edwin Lefevre [fictionalized bio of Jesse Livermore]

"History repeats itself all the time in Wall Street." A fictionalized biography of Jesse Livermore, one of history's most famous speculators. This is an enriching book, worth reading every decade or so across your investment career. And it's a genuinely fun read, conveying the free-wheeling investment culture of the days before the Securities and Exchange Act. When you're young and beginning to invest, this book thrills you with all the bravado of speculating. When you're older, after you've seen a few things and learned many of the manipulations and other techniques the investment industry uses to extract money from you, the book becomes more of a cautionary tale of things not to do, traps not to step in, things to avoid. This is the third time I've read this book (I'm now in my fourth decade as an investor, so I guess that makes me one reading behind schedule), and what struck me most this time around was Livermore's self-admitted weaknesses:...

The Retirement Myth by Craig S. Karpel

A 1995-era book for Boomers by a pre-Boomer (the author is technically a tail-end Silent, but he writes and thinks like a Boomer) who is dismayed at the Boomers' complete unpreparedness as they Boom their way towards an imaginary retirement in a system the author thinks is about to collapse.  Let's get the bottom line out of the way. This is a bad and boring book with incontinent logic.  Then why read it? You  don't have to, and shouldn't. But I often review bad books as an intellectual exercise: to think about what is wrong with a book, what should and should not have been done in writing it, where the errors (of, say, conception, of structure, of logic, of rhetoric) are, and so on. And with books that make predictions, it's a glorious opportunity to practice epistemic humility to read that book after its predictions should have (but didn't) come true. Finally, you can mine even the worst books for useful insights--or in this case contra-insights, since the in...

Confessions of a Medical Heretic by Robert S. Mendelsohn, MD

"I have written this book precisely to scare and to radicalize people before they are hurt. Let this book be your radicalizing experience." The more I come into contact with modern medicine, the more I've watched my elders' lives intersect with it, the more I've observed the field's neomania and accompanying iatrogenic harms, the more I realize that everyone--everyone!--should read the following four books: H. Gilbert Welch: Less Medicine, More Health Ivan Illich: Medical Nemesis Dr. John Sarno: The Divided Mind Robert S. Mendelsohn: Confessions of a Medical Heretic While reading these works, it will be worth noting your internal reaction to them. Do you agree? Do you strongly reject? Why? And what might this indicate about your attachment to your existing beliefs about medicine? In Confession of a Medical Heretic , author Dr. Robert Mendelsohn frames up modern medicine as a type of religion, complete with priests (read: doctors), sacraments, rituals, and even...