Skip to main content

Appointment in Samarra by John O'Hara

A 1934 novel set in the early Depression years, centered around a man who today we might describe as a high-functioning narcissist: a man filled with rage and self-absorption, constantly running scenes in his head about all the things he can't stand about the people around him.

The novel contextualizes an interesting hinge point in United States socio-cultural history, when the Depression had set in but hadn't yet irrevocably changed society away from Roaring '20s-era libertinism. You also get a sense of the everyday social divides of "normal" America in those days, the era's reflexive classism, sectarianism and antisemitism. The author has a gift for acerbic commentary about social status, comments that ring true regardless of era.

It's interesting to see how certain social differences back then seem laughable now. Take the Catholic/Protestant divide, a central element of conflict among characters in this novel. This specific conflict may have been significant then, but it seems pointless and silly today, since in today's era civilization has far larger conflicts on a far greater scale. Sectarian conflicts have moved up in phylum to Christian vs. Muslim; the class conflicts have gone from trivial class distinctions to an all-out war between elites and everyone else; and if that isn't enough we also are fighting a culture-wars conflict and a brewing global geopolitical power struggle. You look back at people bickering over the Catholic/Protestant divide and you just want to climb into the novel and shake people and show them what's really coming.

The title refers to an old fable about how you can't run from your destiny--in fact, even your attempt to run from it fulfills it. The main character of this book destroys his reputation and his life in a matter of a few short days, thanks to rage, poor judgment, far too much alcohol, and an unwillingness to ask forgiveness. 

This isn't a great novel, by some measures it's not even a good novel. I'd recommend it only to those interested in context for a prior Fourth Turning/Crisis-type era in history in order to better navigate the current era. 

Pair with:
How To Deal With Narcissists by Anonymous Conservative 

Notes: 
* "Tonight's dinner, as almost every guest was able to tell at a glance, was the club's two-fifty dinner. This was a club dinner dance, and all members were invited. At a dinner such as the Ammermanns', the hostess could arrange with the steward for the dollar-fifty (roast chicken), the two-dollar (roast turkey), or the two-fifty (filet mignon), and this had been the filet mignon dinner. The Armormands had just that much money, and their position in Gibbsville was just that certain and insecure, that they had to give the best of everything."

* There's an interesting pacing technique in this novel: the author uses a technique of changing from one character viewpoint to another via shorter and shorter minisegments during the last third of the book. It has the effect of artificially speeding up the pacing and tension. Interesting device.

Vocab:
Swindle sheet: an expense account
Sawbuck: a ten-dollar bill
Paresis: a condition of muscular weakness caused by nerve damage or disease; partial paralysis; also can mean brain inflammation in the later stages of syphilis, causing progressive dementia and paralysis.
Flivver: a cheap car or aircraft, especially one in bad condition. [Heh, today we'd use the word hoop-dee.]

More Posts

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker

Tedious, weak, and worst of all  "riddled" with errors  and oversights. Do not read. I recommend instead  Dreaming: A Very Short Introduction  by J. Allan Hobson  for information about the REM/dreaming stage of sleep, as well as  Restful Sleep  by Deepak Chopra  for readers interested in practical help for improving sleep quality. Unlike Why We Sleep , both of these books are short, direct, readable and clear. Sadly, I also have to spend a brief few sentences  on Alexey Guzey's devastating criticisms of this book . Alexey's entire post is very much worth reading, but if you want to see just one glaring example of atrocious academic ethics, you can start with a chart Matthew Walker uses in Chapter 6 to prove a linear relationship between sleep loss and sports injury-- except that he cuts off the part of the chart that disproves his argument . This is childish middle school stuff, way beneath the line of a Berkeley and Harvard professor, a...

By All Means Available: Memoirs of a Life in Intelligence, Special Operations, and Strategy by Michael G. Vickers

The least deceptive way to read this endless, muddled and minutia-laden memoir would be to view it as a very long piece of propaganda: a type of limited hangout of all of the covert (and overt) things the United States does globally in its attempts to project power. It can also be read as an attempt at an extended--and I mean extended --defense of the CIA and all of its meddlings all over the world. This is if you actually read the book. Don't. Piled up with words but saying little of substance, this is the most obfuscatory memoir I've ever read. The author's voice fundamentally irritates: he has a compulsive need to share staggering amounts of unnecessary detail, he comes across as a relentless credit hog, and he repeatedly attempts to place himself right in the middle of the action--even when it's clear he wasn't. Perhaps least ethical of all, he has a habit of framing his actions and decisions so they appear more correct and predictive in retrospect than they ac...

Deep Response: An Emergency Education in Post-Consumer Praxis by Tyler Disney

Tremendously useful. This is a book about meta-preparation: about what it really means to be prepared when you don't know the future. It teaches readers how to think about skill development, optionality and flexibility--and by virtue of these meta-tools, how to earn true individual self-sovereignty. Deep Response is a sophisticated strategy-level discussion hidden in a simple story: a thirty-something man goes back in time to offer guidance to his twenty-something younger self. Their discussions are engrossing on many, many levels, as the two characters--with radically different perspectives, despite being the same person--work out various life problems. The older character wants to warn the younger man that all of his strivings will eventually cause him to achieve nearly the exact opposite of what he seeks, and worse, if he doesn't adjust, his life will soon lack enough flexibility to do anything about it. The reader is the lucky beneficiary, getting exposure to a wide-rangi...