Skip to main content

Butterfield 8 by John O'Hara

Forgettable and quite honestly unpleasant 1930s-era novel about libertines in New York City. At least I hope it's forgettable, because I'd like to forget I read it. The plot and characters are nihilistic and the novel is dark. Not the kind of novel I'd recommend to brighten your day.

The story centers around a young, damaged woman who's into herself, who's both shallow and (unluckily for her) beautiful. She easily attracts men, everywhere, all the time, and her rampaging sex life even grosses her out (the book implies that she's slept with dozens and dozens of men, yet she's still in her early 20s--and remember, this is the 1930s). All the depredations, decadence and dramas she gets caught up in eventually catch up with her, but to the reader it's an empty story without even a proper ending. Imagine something like Truman Capote's Breakfast at Tiffany's with an irritating, unlikable Holly Golightly.

That said, the novel has some interesting proto-modernist structural elements: it opens with several scenelets where both the characters and the scenes themselves intersect and intertwine with each other. Also, buried in the novel there's an offhand self-reference to O'Hara's previous novel: two of the characters in Butterfield 8 look across a speakeasy and see a woman who looks just like someone from Appointment in Samara. You'd miss it entirely unless you'd just finished that other novel. These and other modernist elements make the novel seem like something written in the 1960s rather than 1935, but they don't make the novel redeemable enough to read.

Once again, you get a real taste for the libertinism of the 1920s and early 1930s, and after two John O'Hara novels in a row it certainly appears to be a pattern--but I won't be sticking around for any more of his novels to see if he can write beyond this theme.

More Posts

Hot, Flat and Crowded by Thomas Friedman

I've now read three of Thomas Friedman's books, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, The World Is Flat, and now, Hot, Flat, and Crowded. And Hot Flat and Crowded is--by far--the weakest book of the three. In fact, a cynic might consider it more of a brand extension than a book--a recycling of The World is Flat to include well-meaning and repetitive chapters on energy policy, the environment and global warming. And despite his earnest and palliative writing tone, Friedman's political message has become shrill, and that shrillness debases many of the potentially intriguing ideas and arguments he makes throughout the book. According to Friedman, everything is the Americans' fault. We're supposed to be leaders of the free world, yet we should only act with the consensus blessing of all the rest of the world's countries. We invaded Iraq, which was wrong. We invaded Afghanistan, which was sort of right, but we're making far too many mistakes there. We don't educat...

How to Make Money in Any Market by Jim Cramer

Not Cramer's best, although there are insights here. I recommend instead two of Cramer's earlier works: Real Money: Sane Investing in an Insane World  and Getting Back to Even . The central idea in  How to Make Money in Any Market  is to structure your portfolio with roughly half of your assets in a low-fee S&P 500 index fund, and roughly the other half in five or so carefully researched "hero" stocks that are meant to be long-term secular growers and compounders over time. A remaining sliver of your portfolio should be in some sort of hedge: gold or Bitcoin [1] . Chapter 7 walks readers through this elegant portfolio structure. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] The books' weaknesses show u...

Solaris by Stanislaw Lem

Fascinating and challenging 1960s-era sci-fi about the incredible, even unimaginable, difficulties involved in first contact between civilizations. The planet Solaris features a strange, tissue-like surface that usually acts like a liquid, but can also spontaneously form all sorts of shapes and geological formations. It has been studied and debated over by generations of Earth scientists, many of whom believe the planet itself exhibits a form of intelligence, perhaps even consciousness and self-awareness.   Unlike TV sci-fi, where aliens always seem to be other actors wearing bumpy rubber foreheads who all somehow speak great English, this is "hard-science" sci-fi, and it traffics in the much more plausible notion that an alien species would have an intelligence so radically different from ours that we might never understand it. Author Stanislaw Lem tells the story in a nested and indirect fashion, reminding the reader a bit of Mary Shelley's  Frankenstein . The reader ...