Skip to main content

The Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande

By describing how good hospitals and surgical centers could be, Atul Gawande indirectly--and likely without intending to do so--describes quite a number of ugly truths about how they actually are.

The truth is, more likely than not, the surgery team cutting you open isn't a coherent team. They likely don't even know each others' names. Surgeons as a rule generally resist using basic checklist procedures to prevent infection risk and catastrophic errors. In fact, Gawande finds surgeons often offended by the very idea! 

Worst of all, the hospitals they work for likely don't even know--and don't want to know--their error rates, complication rates, infection rates and death rates. After all, what's the incentive to track data that might make you look bad? 

 The idea that it could be as difficult as Gawande finds it to get surgery teams to use basic checklists (something the airline industry has done for generations to produce astoundingly good safety records) is staggering. But it illustrates an excellent example of a "skin in the game" problem, and it explains why pilots are happy to use checklists if they improve safety, while surgeons ego-resist the idea. 

 Why? Because the pilot is actually on the plane with you. The moment the surgeon closes you up and ships you off, you become somebody else's problem. On to the next patient. 

Finally, this reader received from this highly useful book one more valuable--and almost certainly unintended--message: Do not have surgery unless absolutely necessary.

More Posts

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker

Tedious, weak, and worst of all  "riddled" with errors  and oversights. Do not read. I recommend instead  Dreaming: A Very Short Introduction  by J. Allan Hobson  for information about the REM/dreaming stage of sleep, as well as  Restful Sleep  by Deepak Chopra  for readers interested in practical help for improving sleep quality. Unlike Why We Sleep , both of these books are short, direct, readable and clear. Sadly, I also have to spend a brief few sentences  on Alexey Guzey's devastating criticisms of this book . Alexey's entire post is very much worth reading, but if you want to see just one glaring example of atrocious academic ethics, you can start with a chart Matthew Walker uses in Chapter 6 to prove a linear relationship between sleep loss and sports injury-- except that he cuts off the part of the chart that disproves his argument . This is childish middle school stuff, way beneath the line of a Berkeley and Harvard professor, a...

Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications by Irving J. Good

This collection of scientific papers is a challenging but useful discussion on statistical methods, probability, randomness, logic and decision-making. Much of the book centers around Bayesian statistical methods and when and why to use them, as well as "philosophy of science"-type discussions on when a scientist should--or sometimes must--apply subjective judgments to scientific problems. It will help enormously if you've had a semester or two of statistics to really get at the meat of this book. If not, scroll down a few paragraphs for a short list of layperson-friendly books that address many of these subjects more accessibly. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] Author Irving Good worked with Alan Turing at ...

Deep Response: An Emergency Education in Post-Consumer Praxis by Tyler Disney

Tremendously useful. This is a book about meta-preparation: about what it really means to be prepared when you don't know the future. It teaches readers how to think about skill development, optionality and flexibility--and by virtue of these meta-tools, how to earn true individual self-sovereignty. Deep Response is a sophisticated strategy-level discussion hidden in a simple story: a thirty-something man goes back in time to offer guidance to his twenty-something younger self. Their discussions are engrossing on many, many levels, as the two characters--with radically different perspectives, despite being the same person--work out various life problems. The older character wants to warn the younger man that all of his strivings will eventually cause him to achieve nearly the exact opposite of what he seeks, and worse, if he doesn't adjust, his life will soon lack enough flexibility to do anything about it. The reader is the lucky beneficiary, getting exposure to a wide-rangi...