Skip to main content

By the Bomb's Early Light by by Paul Boyer

A really interesting book, most likely not for the reasons the author intended. 

The subject of this book is the response of American culture and society to the use of nuclear weapons at the end of World War II. What was the response from media, from book writers, from church leaders, from intellectuals, from government leaders? The author explores it exhaustively. And I mean exhaustively.

But this isn't what's interesting about the book! In fact you can just read the epilogue and get 98% of the book's direct, intended value from the last 5% of the content.

What was interesting--fascinating actually--about this book was to see a blatant example of the entire collection of phenomena that happen around a culture and its media when something tremendously fear-inducing happens. We see a series of changing media narratives, followed by the arc of the battle for narrative control, usually fought between government and media (although in the postmodern era we more commonly see government and media in bed sculpting narratives together).

We see a range of highly confident commentary from that era's punditry: from hand-wringing worries about the declining morality of man to epistemically arrogant predictions of how life will be in the post-atomic era. We hear all about how cities are doomed (obviously, nobody will want to live in dense population centers anymore... at least, that's what they tried to tell us then). 

Worst of all, we see the elites of the era try to use these events, and our fears about them, to increase their power and control.

Does all this seem somehow familiar right now? During our current era of contested elections and COVID? It sure does to me. 

The parallels continue: after a few years of media saturation of images and "news" about nuclear annihilation, a type of general narcotizing dysfunction sets in, and the people arrive at a point where the entire thing becomes a type of cliche. Soon, nobody pays any attention at all to the very risk that seemed so terrifying just a few years ago. That is, until the next fear comes along, when we'll get to do it all over again. 

Thus this book did something incredibly valuable (if unintended): it deepened my understanding of reality.

There is alarmist existential fear in every era, and every era's media, government and elites will attempt to use a given crisis to their own ends. Crises (manufactured or real, it doesn't matter) are extremely valuable--to them. Needless to say, in every era, it always really, really seems like a real crisis. Otherwise the ruse wouldn't work. 

Of course, comparing the post-Hiroshima and Nagasaki era of the late 1940s to today's modren soypeople spilling their lattes while tweeting about how Trump is "terrifying, I'm literally shaking" we get some much needed perspective on what a real crisis actually might look like.

More Posts

A Technique for Producing Ideas by James Webb Young

It's a rare pleasure to find so many insights in such a short book. A modern reader can't help but notice the stark contrast between A Technique for Producing Ideas  and most modern books, which might have a few paragraphs' worth of insights, but yet always seem to be fluffed and padded out to at least 200-300 pages. The author gives away a formula for creativity and idea generation that is simple, but not easy. And as a result almost no one will follow it. In the author's own one-paragraph summary, his process is: * First, the gathering of raw materials--both the materials of your immediate problem and the materials which come from a constant enrichment of your store of general knowledge.  * Second, the working over of these materials in your mind.  * Third, the incubating stage, where you let something beside the conscious mind do the work of synthesis.  * Fourth, the actual birth of the Idea--the 'Eureka! I have it!' stage. * And fifth, the final shaping and ...

The Genesis of Russophobia in Great Britain by John H. Gleason

In-depth (and surprisingly interesting!) analysis of the shifting public and government opinion on Russia during late 18th and early/mid 19th century England, plus a useful (and telling) exploration of the various propaganda and media narratives used to drive these opinions. I've written before on this site, many times, that history rhymes, it doesn't repeat exactly, so you have to know your history--and by this I mean know your actual history, not your country's preferred propaganda narrative of history--in order to see that rhyme to make useful, accurate predictions. It is fascinating to see England in the 1800s applying various forms of the same propagandized and manufactured Russophobia that we see in the United States today. England went from a literal  alliance with Russia (against Napoleonic France) to a state of paranoid loathing of Russia in a matter of decades; the USA likewise went from " aren't they our friends now? " after the Soviet collapse to...

The Design of Everyday Things by Don Norman

This looks like a book about foundational concepts of good design, but in reality it's a deep and intelligent book addressing a tremendous range of topics: psychology, cognition, on minding details, on being "meta" about rules and procedures, even how to navigate the modern world. One of the most valuable and interesting books I've read all year. Pair with  The Upper Half of the Motorcycle by Bernt Spiegel.  Notes:  [Warning: Long] 0) Norman's Law : the day the product team is announced, it is behind schedule and over its budget. Ch 1: The Psychopathology of Everyday Things 1) "Norman doors" confusing doors, or doors that don't work right. "The design of the door should indicate how to work it without any need for signs, certainly without any need for trial and error." 2) "Two of the most important characteristics of redesign are discoverability and understanding. * Discoverability : Is it possible to even figure out what actions are...