Skip to main content

Children of Ruin by Adrian Tchaikovsky [spoilers]

In book two of Adrian Tchaikovsky's Children of Time trilogy (I've reviewed book one here), our once-competing spider and human civilizations have now teamed up to explore the universe together. We also meet a separate tiny outpost of humans attempting to establish new planetary colonies (readers should avoid emotional investment into any these human pseudoprotagonists however: the author kills them off). And we also meet an oddly interesting uberoctopus civilization, descended from experiments of one of the outpost humans. The octopus civilization offers a sort of neomalthusian lesson as it experiences massive overpopulation, mass violence, environmental collapse--even mass cannibalism. 

Finally, there's a still weirder species, and the author struggles a bit in portraying it: a sort of cellular "goo collective" that starts out literally colonizing the minds and bodies of the humans and octopi. Later, by a rather sudden and implausible plot event, the goo befriends all the other species and joins them on an interstellar journey.

I more or less gave away the ending right there. 

A central theme of this novel is communication across barriers: cultural, civilizational and biological. How would humans possibly communicate with spiders who can't even hear human speech, but rather "speak" via palp-waving, stepping and posturing? And if that communication gap isn't enough, what happens when you try to reach across the mental chasm between you and the octopus species, who communicate by body color and tentacle graspings? It makes you think twice about the communication barriers we needlessly place between ourselves.

This complicated story jumps from time period to time period, requiring periodic reminders and backstory to fill in gaps for the reader. Characters die off, thousands of years pass, wars erupt between and within species... and then the author closes down the story rather arbitrarily, with an abrupt peace, love and understanding arranged for all. This is a competent novel, but less readable and less immersive than its predecessor. We'll see how the author handles book three in a future review. 


To Read:
Peter Godfrey-Smith: Other Minds [a book about octopus intelligence that the author cites in the acknowledgments]

Vocab (I thank this author for yet again offering quite a collection of new words):
cnidarian: an aquatic invertebrate animal of the phylum Cnidaria, which comprises the coelenterates
sessile: fixed in one place; immobile (of an organism, e.g. a barnacle)
parthenogenesis: a reproductive strategy that involves development of a female (rarely a male) gamete without fertilization; occurs commonly among lower plants and invertebrate animals (particularly rotifers, aphids, ants, wasps, and bees)
bauplan: generalized structural body plan; the generalized structural body plan that characterizes a group of organisms and especially a major taxon (such as a phylum)
flense: to slice the skin or fat from (a carcass, especially that of a whale); to strip (skin or fat) from a carcass; "the skin had been flensed off"
haruspex: one who performs haruspicy or divination by entrails
urticating: causing a stinging or prickling sensation like that given by a nettle
chelicerae: the pair of appendages in front of the mouth in arachnids and some other arthropods, usually modified as pincer-like claws

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Shipping Man by Matthew McCleery

A must-read for shipping investors--and even if you're not, it will likely make one out of you. It's a fun story, hilarious at times, and it teaches readers all kinds of nuances about investing. Our main character, running his own little hedge fund, finds out by pure accident that the Baltic Dry Index is down 97% (!) over the course of just three months. It makes him curious, and this curiosity takes him on a downright Dantean journey through the shipping industry.  He's outwitted left and right: first by savvy bankers in Germany, then by even savvier Greeks. And then, in an awful moment of weakness, he gets lured into buying a "tramp" (a very old, nearly used-up ship needing massive repairs) at what seems like a good price. The industry nearly eats this guy alive more than once, but he comes out the other end a true Shipping Man.  This should be mandatory reading for MBA students. I think back to all the terminally boring "case studies" I had to read ov

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s