Skip to main content

Train to Pakistan by Khushwant Singh

1956 novel about a fictional peasant village in India, half Sikh, half Muslim. At first, this peaceful community avoided the sectarian violence surrounding the 1947 Partition. Until it didn't.

Before everything went wrong, people in this village ordered their days to the schedule of trains passing the town, rarely stopping. But as the chaos of the Partition accelerates, the train system becomes unpredictable and inconsistent, upsetting the natural rhythm of this village and of everyone in it. Then, one particular train arrives that changes everything, engulfing this town in chaos, and a community that lived peacefully for generations suddenly evicts all its Muslims.

I've been reading about India's Partition era because I fear we might see something like it again in the coming years. History rhymes, it has cycles and patterns, and periodically we see mass movements of peoples that reliably explode into terrible violence. You could certainly rank India's Partition with some of history's worst cases: see for example the Bronze Age Collapse, the post-World War II Savage Continent era (I stole the phrase Keith Lowe's book of the same name, see the reading list below), and the 4th century collapse of the Eastern Roman Empire following the Battle of Adrianople (chronicled in Alessandro Barbero's excellent The Day of the Barbarians). I'm sure there are many, many more.

This book isn't a pleasant read, but I believe it is a necessary read. It's a good book, well-written, paced slowly at first (as the reader settles into a different era with a different pace), and then it accelerates to a rapid conclusion--a single act of bravery surrounded by a constellation of cowardice. Sadly, cowardice is the rule rather than the exception: the leaders whose responsibility it is to "do something" about the violence do nothing.
 
It's always a good idea to choose a well-regarded novel about a historical period in addition to reading that period's history. Just as Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms teaches you about World War I, and Lionel Shriver's The Mandibles teaches you more about living in an inflationary era, fiction often teaches you much more than anything else. 

Pair with:
The Shadow of the Great Game by Narenda Singh Sarila
Savage Continent by Keith Lowe
The Day of the Barbarians by Alessandro Barbero

Notes/quotes:
* "You talk rashly like a child. It will get you into trouble one day. Your principal should be to see everything and say nothing. The world changes so rapidly that if you want to get on you cannot afford to align yourself with any person or point of view. Even if you feel strongly about something, learn to keep silent." [I can't help thinking about this today: we have incredibly fierce partisanship in the United States, wars brewing in other parts of the world, an uncertain world order where countries are choosing new sides... it may be dangerous to offer too many opinions about anything.]

* Iqbal, a young, educated non-practicing Sikh who can pass for a Muslim, Hindu or Sikh, arrives in the village as a communist activist/"community organizer." There's quite a vivid scene here where one of the villager brings him a glass of milk that his wife just milked from a buffalo, and he stirs it for the visitor with his own dirty finger. [Ultimately Iqbal turns out to be an example of the cowardice I wrote about above: all he does is implore everybody else to "do something" while standing idly by.]

* The villagers actually never had a problem with English colonial control, they didn't comprehend the idea of being free, they didn't even grasp why the English left. "Freedom is for the educated people who fought for it. We were slaves of the English, now we will be slaves of the educated Indians--or the Pakistanis... We were better off under the British. At least there was security."

More Posts

How to Survive and Thrive in the Coming Wave of Deflation by A. Gary Shilling

I'd like to accomplish two things with this review of a book that, frankly, isn't worth a close read. First, I'll briefly point to the specific sections of the book readers can skim to extract most of the book's value--see the next paragraph for that part. Second, I want to use this book--which is the macroeconomic prediction equivalent of a man with a hammer--to expose the "expert prediction" game and illustrate how dangerous it is to credulously follow so-called expert predictions, especially when it comes to stock markets and economics. We'll start with what to skip and skim. A time-constrained reader can extract 99% of the value of the book by skimming parts 3 and 4 (pages 209-331) and studying the two charts on pages 330 and 331, which spell out all the dos and don'ts for surviving deflation. Readers might also consider reading Chapter 15 for its discussion of the Kondratieff wave concept, a useful mental model for thinking about cyclicality in a...

Generative Energy: Restoring the Wholeness of Life by Ray Peat

A disorganized book by a highly-censored medical iconoclast. Despite its sloppiness, it will still send you down a lot of good rabbit holes. I don't recommend a labored, close reading of this book: just use it as an introduction to Ray Peat's dissident health and physiology ideas. In certain ways, we can think of Ray Peat, along with Robert Mendelsohn and Ivan Illich , as direct ancestors of the courageous COVID-era medical dissidents: doctors like Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Pierre Kory, Kirk and Kimberly Milhoan, Paul Marik, Meryl Nass and Peter Gotszche, among others, who bravely spoke out against foolish lockdowns, hospital protocols, government mandates and the use of risky (but of course highly lucrative) therapeutics like Remdesivir--and were censored, suspended or fired for it. [1] As a general rule: in any knowledge domain you should always know who the dissident thinkers are. They are usually the ones who were right all along. [2] [A quick  affiliate link ...

The Congress of Vienna, 1814-1815 by Sir Charles Kingsley Webster

When we study history, we often see clear analogies from one era to another. This book is such an exercise in analogy: it is an analysis of the post-Napoleonic world order used as a specific study tool to grapple with the post-World War I world order. Today's readers can use this book as analogy too, to better understand events in our day. It's excruciatingly obvious that the leadership throughout the entire West is profoundly ignorant of history. And if it's true that those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it, then those of us who do know our history--and can see various analogies and parallels to the past--may well figure out what's going to happen well before they do. I'll explore a few of these analogies in this essay. One immediately visible example is the various interlocking suzerainty/vassalage arrangements in place in any given geopolitical landscape, and how rapidly they can shift when there's a disruption among the dominant states. ...