Skip to main content

Waiting for the Mahatma by R. K. Narayan

We learn far more truth from fiction than history. This novel captures India's long and uneven journey towards independence from the eyes of a young couple, Sriram and Bharati, who find themselves working closely with Gandhi.

You get a sense of the frustration and despair of the Indian people during that era, of India's confused mixture of antipathy and codependency with England. It's also interesting to see the spectrum of violence of the various resistance movements, ranging from Gandhi's absolute non-violence to other actors choosing far more aggressive measures of sabotage and terrorism.

The novel's fictional scenes with Gandhi give an interesting perspective on his striking mix of humility and power. He has a knack for upsetting the status quo in nearly everything he does: teaching his fellow Indians self-reliance and self-sovereignty by showing them how to spin and sew their own crude clothing; teaching people to boil saltwater rather than buy salt at inflated prices from British sources. In one scene, Gandhi scandalously blows off the wealthy elite of a city in order to stay in the "untouchable" neighborhood.

Of course Gandhi (and everyone else) knows that India's elites are "elite" because they condoned or benefited from British occupation. You can't colonize and control a country with seven times your population without collaboration of that country's elites. Thus Gandhi wanted (and needed) to thumb his nose at the established hierarchy of India. 

No one could control this guy, and it's amazing to watch. 

Gandhi tells a crowd: "It is not enough for you to clap your hands and show your appreciation of me. I am not prepared to accept it all so easily. I want you really to make sure of a change in your hearts before you ever think of asking the British to leave the shores of India. It's all very well for you to take up the cry and create an uproar. But that's not enough. I want you to clear your hearts and minds and make certain that only love resides there, and there is no residue of bitterness for past history. Only then can you say to the British, 'Please leave this country to be managed or mismanaged by us, that's purely our own business, and come back anytime you like as our friends and distinguished guests, not as our rulers.'"

This is the second of two novels I've read by this author, both offering readers wonderfully useful context on mid-20th century India. You can find my review of Narayan's novel The Financial Expert here

More Posts

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain

Huckleberry Finn is really two books: a good one and a bad one. The good one, the first fifteen or sixteen chapters, is engaging, original and beautiful. The second book, the bad one, is hackneyed, inorganic, farcical, and in places nearly unreadable.  It feels like the overall work was written by two different people, which in fact it more or less was: the Mark Twain of 1876, fresh off the tremendous success of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, and the Mark Twain of seven years later, cramped with financial stress and writer's block. Thus the back two-thirds of the book feels more like a collection of vaguely related short stories than a coherent novel, with random characters entering and exiting the stage to resuscitate an increasingly cadaverous plot. Twain is even forced to wedge Tom Sawyer back into the story late in the book, thanks to one of American literature's least plausible coincidences. It brings to mind Virginia Woolf's famously condescending remark about the no...

Godel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter

A wonderful, beautiful work. Ask me about it, and I'll start nattering at you about sphex wasps, fugues, isomorphisms and "jumping out of the system." And my voice will trail off and you'll see me get a faraway look in my eyes. It's actually quite difficult to describe what this book is about--at least, impossible to describe in a few short sentences. [1] But there are so many ways to read Godel, Escher, Bach , and such a wide range of ideas and insights one can get out of it, that it becomes a different book for every reader. And let me confess, if you haven't read GEB  yet, I am jealous of you. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] First of all this book can be understood on many levels. You can read it a...

Understanding Human Nature by Alfred Adler

A difficult book, in part because Adler isn't all that good at expressing his ideas: he's a practitioner, not a writer, and it shows. Further, I believe Understanding Human Nature has more in direct value than direct value: the reader has to move from what the book teaches to a layer of second-order insights. I'll explain what I mean in a moment. First a quick summary of the book's core themes and ideas. According to Adler, we all have a psyche, formed and largely fixed in childhood, and that psyche has an ulterior psychological goal. For most of us, unfortunately, that goal takes the form of striving for power, control, attention, or superiority. Throughout the book Adler gives examples where peoples' psyche-driven strivings cause suffering, both for themselves as well as everyone else in their blast radius. Most of us will likely resist Adler's claim that to understand other people and their motivations you must first understand their psyches' "ulter...