Skip to main content

Waiting for the Mahatma by R. K. Narayan

We learn far more truth from fiction than history. This novel captures India's long and uneven journey towards independence from the eyes of a young couple, Sriram and Bharati, who find themselves working closely with Gandhi.

You get a sense of the frustration and despair of the Indian people during that era, of India's confused mixture of antipathy and codependency with England. It's also interesting to see the spectrum of violence of the various resistance movements, ranging from Gandhi's absolute non-violence to other actors choosing far more aggressive measures of sabotage and terrorism.

The novel's fictional scenes with Gandhi give an interesting perspective on his striking mix of humility and power. He has a knack for upsetting the status quo in nearly everything he does: teaching his fellow Indians self-reliance and self-sovereignty by showing them how to spin and sew their own crude clothing; teaching people to boil saltwater rather than buy salt at inflated prices from British sources. In one scene, Gandhi scandalously blows off the wealthy elite of a city in order to stay in the "untouchable" neighborhood.

Of course Gandhi (and everyone else) knows that India's elites are "elite" because they condoned or benefited from British occupation. You can't colonize and control a country with seven times your population without collaboration of that country's elites. Thus Gandhi wanted (and needed) to thumb his nose at the established hierarchy of India. 

No one could control this guy, and it's amazing to watch. 

Gandhi tells a crowd: "It is not enough for you to clap your hands and show your appreciation of me. I am not prepared to accept it all so easily. I want you really to make sure of a change in your hearts before you ever think of asking the British to leave the shores of India. It's all very well for you to take up the cry and create an uproar. But that's not enough. I want you to clear your hearts and minds and make certain that only love resides there, and there is no residue of bitterness for past history. Only then can you say to the British, 'Please leave this country to be managed or mismanaged by us, that's purely our own business, and come back anytime you like as our friends and distinguished guests, not as our rulers.'"

This is the second of two novels I've read by this author, both offering readers wonderfully useful context on mid-20th century India. You can find my review of Narayan's novel The Financial Expert here

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think