Skip to main content

Range by David Epstein

If you like Malcolm Gladwell-style writing you'll like this book: it has lots of often cutesy, counter-intuitive stories and plenty of "studies show" scientific studies that prove the author's points (naturally) throughout. It makes the book a diverting and easy read. Plenty of ideas in here to think about too if you'd like to get better at courting serendipity and insight in your day-to-day and/or professional life. All in all, a fairly useful book. 

Notes: 
* Kind learning environments (chess) versus wicked learning environments (reality). 

* Cognitive entrenchment 

* Rule seeking behavior... Learning by multiple choice or if/then statements. Why giving hints or supplying rules does not help you learn, where the appearance of learning isn't actual learning. 

* "Easy learning" versus more "difficult learning," where more difficult learning actually sticks. 

* Your perceptions of your own learning can be misleading. if it seems like it's easy, like you're making rapid progress, you're most likely not learning as well as you think. 

* "Far transfer": a knowledge structure that is so flexible that it can be applied effectively even in new domains or extremely novel situations. 

* Thinking analogically. Kepler using analogies.

* Career and job "match quality," how the army had trouble keeping people "matched" to careers that suited them or challenged them. Why it's important to have the ability to switch jobs or fields. 

* "You have to carry a big basket to bring something home" [This goes toward open-mindedness, can you think broadly, how much can you "enlarge" your basket?]

* Serendipitous "outside thinking" to arrive at solutions. "Lateral thinking with withered technology": Gunpei Yokoi at Nintendo, making games out of very old tech materials. 

* The "perverse inverse relationship" between fame and prediction accuracy. Yet another reason to ignore media pundits!! 

* "Dropping your tools" as metaphor for cognitive flexibility in wicked learning environments: firefighters, NASA engineers, etc.

More Posts

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain

Huckleberry Finn is really two books: a good one and a bad one. The good one, the first fifteen or sixteen chapters, is engaging, original and beautiful. The second book, the bad one, is hackneyed, inorganic, farcical, and in places nearly unreadable.  It feels like the overall work was written by two different people, which in fact it more or less was: the Mark Twain of 1876, fresh off the tremendous success of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, and the Mark Twain of seven years later, cramped with financial stress and writer's block. Thus the back two-thirds of the book feels more like a collection of vaguely related short stories than a coherent novel, with random characters entering and exiting the stage to resuscitate an increasingly cadaverous plot. Twain is even forced to wedge Tom Sawyer back into the story late in the book, thanks to one of American literature's least plausible coincidences. It brings to mind Virginia Woolf's famously condescending remark about the no...

The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain

Fun, engaging novel about a very intelligent--and very naughty--boy. If we're lucky, we will all have a little bit of Tom Sawyer in us: we all misbehave, we all show off, we all counted the interminable minutes until recess, and we all have our little schemes and connivances. Nobody remembers the boys who behave themselves all the time. There's some subtlety to Twain's writing too at times: we see a good example in Chapter 6, when Tom is late to school. [1] You have to read with fairly close attention to note that Tom sees an empty seat, the only empty seat, next to Becky Thatcher on the girls' side of the classroom. He was thinking several steps ahead, and this was exactly why he spontaneously admits to his teacher, loudly, that his tardiness was due to talking to the town's black sheep, Huck Finn. He did it because he knew the teacher would put him on the girls' side of the schoolroom, right next to Becky! [A quick affiliate link to Amazon for those readers...

Understanding Human Nature by Alfred Adler

A difficult book, in part because Adler isn't all that good at expressing his ideas: he's a practitioner, not a writer, and it shows. Further, I believe Understanding Human Nature has more in direct value than direct value: the reader has to move from what the book teaches to a layer of second-order insights. I'll explain what I mean in a moment. First a quick summary of the book's core themes and ideas. According to Adler, we all have a psyche, formed and largely fixed in childhood, and that psyche has an ulterior psychological goal. For most of us, unfortunately, that goal takes the form of striving for power, control, attention, or superiority. Throughout the book Adler gives examples where peoples' psyche-driven strivings cause suffering, both for themselves as well as everyone else in their blast radius. Most of us will likely resist Adler's claim that to understand other people and their motivations you must first understand their psyches' "ulter...