Skip to main content

The Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande

By describing how good hospitals and surgical centers could be, Atul Gawande indirectly--and likely without intending to do so--describes quite a number of ugly truths about how they actually are.

The truth is, more likely than not, the surgery team cutting you open isn't a coherent team. They likely don't even know each others' names. Surgeons as a rule generally resist using basic checklist procedures to prevent infection risk and catastrophic errors. In fact, Gawande finds surgeons often offended by the very idea! 

Worst of all, the hospitals they work for likely don't even know--and don't want to know--their error rates, complication rates, infection rates and death rates. After all, what's the incentive to track data that might make you look bad? 

 The idea that it could be as difficult as Gawande finds it to get surgery teams to use basic checklists (something the airline industry has done for generations to produce astoundingly good safety records) is staggering. But it illustrates an excellent example of a "skin in the game" problem, and it explains why pilots are happy to use checklists if they improve safety, while surgeons ego-resist the idea. 

 Why? Because the pilot is actually on the plane with you. The moment the surgeon closes you up and ships you off, you become somebody else's problem. On to the next patient. 

Finally, this reader received from this highly useful book one more valuable--and almost certainly unintended--message: Do not have surgery unless absolutely necessary.

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think