Skip to main content

The Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande

By describing how good hospitals and surgical centers could be, Atul Gawande indirectly--and likely without intending to do so--describes quite a number of ugly truths about how they actually are.

The truth is, more likely than not, the surgery team cutting you open isn't a coherent team. They likely don't even know each others' names. Surgeons as a rule generally resist using basic checklist procedures to prevent infection risk and catastrophic errors. In fact, Gawande finds surgeons often offended by the very idea! 

Worst of all, the hospitals they work for likely don't even know--and don't want to know--their error rates, complication rates, infection rates and death rates. After all, what's the incentive to track data that might make you look bad? 

 The idea that it could be as difficult as Gawande finds it to get surgery teams to use basic checklists (something the airline industry has done for generations to produce astoundingly good safety records) is staggering. But it illustrates an excellent example of a "skin in the game" problem, and it explains why pilots are happy to use checklists if they improve safety, while surgeons ego-resist the idea. 

 Why? Because the pilot is actually on the plane with you. The moment the surgeon closes you up and ships you off, you become somebody else's problem. On to the next patient. 

Finally, this reader received from this highly useful book one more valuable--and almost certainly unintended--message: Do not have surgery unless absolutely necessary.

More Posts

Godel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter

A wonderful, beautiful work. Ask me about it, and I'll start nattering at you about sphex wasps, fugues, isomorphisms and "jumping out of the system." And my voice will trail off and you'll see me get a faraway look in my eyes. It's actually quite difficult to describe what this book is about--at least, impossible to describe in a few short sentences. [1] But there are so many ways to read Godel, Escher, Bach , and such a wide range of ideas and insights one can get out of it, that it becomes a different book for every reader. And let me confess, if you haven't read GEB  yet, I am jealous of you. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] First of all this book can be understood on many levels. You can read it a...

Understanding Human Nature by Alfred Adler

A difficult book, in part because Adler isn't all that good at expressing his ideas: he's a practitioner, not a writer, and it shows. Further, I believe Understanding Human Nature has more in direct value than direct value: the reader has to move from what the book teaches to a layer of second-order insights. I'll explain what I mean in a moment. First a quick summary of the book's core themes and ideas. According to Adler, we all have a psyche, formed and largely fixed in childhood, and that psyche has an ulterior psychological goal. For most of us, unfortunately, that goal takes the form of striving for power, control, attention, or superiority. Throughout the book Adler gives examples where peoples' psyche-driven strivings cause suffering, both for themselves as well as everyone else in their blast radius. Most of us will likely resist Adler's claim that to understand other people and their motivations you must first understand their psyches' "ulter...

Generative Energy: Restoring the Wholeness of Life by Ray Peat

A disorganized book by a highly-censored medical iconoclast. Despite its sloppiness, it will still send you down a lot of good rabbit holes. I don't recommend a labored, close reading of this book: just use it as an introduction to Ray Peat's dissident health and physiology ideas. In certain ways, we can think of Ray Peat, along with Robert Mendelsohn and Ivan Illich , as direct ancestors of the courageous COVID-era medical dissidents: doctors like Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Pierre Kory, Kirk and Kimberly Milhoan, Paul Marik, Meryl Nass and Peter Gotszche, among others, who bravely spoke out against foolish lockdowns, hospital protocols, government mandates and the use of risky (but of course highly lucrative) therapeutics like Remdesivir--and were censored, suspended or fired for it. [1] As a general rule: in any knowledge domain you should always know who the dissident thinkers are. They are usually the ones who were right all along. [2] [A quick  affiliate link ...