Skip to main content

Straight to Hell by John LeFevre

A strange book: think of the movie The Wolf of Wall Street, but instead of retail brokers on Long Island, it's the institutional bond syndicate desk at a major bank. But the pranks, the drugs and the ludicrous behavior are all the same. 

Straight to Hell is crass, outlandish, instructive at certain points[*] and genuinely comedic at others--but I wish I hadn't read it. It's hard to tell what the author is trying to do exactly (moralize? satirize? shock? warn?), but ultimately the book leaves you with a gross feeling: for the author, for all the people in the story, and for yourself as the reader.

For readers interested in this genre: stick to Michael Lewis' classic Liar's Poker. 

[*] Instructive, that is, if you're curious how an institutional sell-side bond house works; how bond issuance deals are won and lost; how major sell-side firms both compete and cooperate as they fight over deals; how these deals, once won, are then doled out to institutional investor clients. I can't imagine many readers would share this curiosity, however--and you have to fight through a lot of unsavory stories to satisfy it.

Notes: 
1) Now that I've read my fair share of works about Buddhism (see in particular Thich Nhat Hanh's The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching) I'd consider this book an example of "bad intellectual nutriments."

2) Early on you can tell this book is unlikely to interest somebody from outside the business.

3) The author starts at an intern, then does the company training program (note the ruthlessness the company uses to weed out underperformers), he survives his first few years, then moves up to join the fixed income syndicate desk, a big job.  

4) "Statistically speaking, you shouldn't worry about what your first wife's mother looks like." I had to think about this one for a while before I got it.

5) On winning the right to offer a deal on behalf of a bond issuer (getting the client "pregnant") and then "we'll moonwalk them back once we win the deal" to agree to more realistic deal terms (on interest rates for example, or deal size). Also you control the client by suggesting it would signal weakness or be embarrassing to cancel a deal after a long roadshow, the client might lose "access" to capital markets, etc.

6) The deal process--everything from bakeoff to roadshow to deal allocation--is all well explained, but will likely be over the head of most readers outside the industry.

7) The mechanics of a bond deal that goes badly: just the same as a bad IPO. When clients get a "full allocation" they instantly know the deal is bad.

8) Note also the game theory aspect of bond issuers who frequently need to access capital markets: See the Thai telecom company with debt maturities that need to be "rolled" in each of the next few years; we thus have a game theory situation with repeated iterations, so the parties involved can only screw each other over to a certain point! They know they have to play the game again soon. Equity deals are less like this. 

9) See also certain interesting agency problems here: say you work for a sell-side bond shop and your client (a company that wants to issue bonds) comes to you, thinking of doing a bond issue between October and December. Well, how does your P&L look? Is your bonus already set for this year? Then encourage the client to wait for January so that deal would show up in next year's bonus numbers--plus you start the year with a great-looking deal pipeline.

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo
Read more

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s
Read more

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think
Read more