Skip to main content

Straight to Hell by John LeFevre

A strange book: think of the movie The Wolf of Wall Street, but instead of retail brokers on Long Island, it's the institutional bond syndicate desk at a major bank. But the pranks, the drugs and the ludicrous behavior are all the same. 

Straight to Hell is crass, outlandish, instructive at certain points[*] and genuinely comedic at others--but I wish I hadn't read it. It's hard to tell what the author is trying to do exactly (moralize? satirize? shock? warn?), but ultimately the book leaves you with a gross feeling: for the author, for all the people in the story, and for yourself as the reader.

For readers interested in this genre: stick to Michael Lewis' classic Liar's Poker. 

[*] Instructive, that is, if you're curious how an institutional sell-side bond house works; how bond issuance deals are won and lost; how major sell-side firms both compete and cooperate as they fight over deals; how these deals, once won, are then doled out to institutional investor clients. I can't imagine many readers would share this curiosity, however--and you have to fight through a lot of unsavory stories to satisfy it.

Notes: 
1) Now that I've read my fair share of works about Buddhism (see in particular Thich Nhat Hanh's The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching) I'd consider this book an example of "bad intellectual nutriments."

2) Early on you can tell this book is unlikely to interest somebody from outside the business.

3) The author starts at an intern, then does the company training program (note the ruthlessness the company uses to weed out underperformers), he survives his first few years, then moves up to join the fixed income syndicate desk, a big job.  

4) "Statistically speaking, you shouldn't worry about what your first wife's mother looks like." I had to think about this one for a while before I got it.

5) On winning the right to offer a deal on behalf of a bond issuer (getting the client "pregnant") and then "we'll moonwalk them back once we win the deal" to agree to more realistic deal terms (on interest rates for example, or deal size). Also you control the client by suggesting it would signal weakness or be embarrassing to cancel a deal after a long roadshow, the client might lose "access" to capital markets, etc.

6) The deal process--everything from bakeoff to roadshow to deal allocation--is all well explained, but will likely be over the head of most readers outside the industry.

7) The mechanics of a bond deal that goes badly: just the same as a bad IPO. When clients get a "full allocation" they instantly know the deal is bad.

8) Note also the game theory aspect of bond issuers who frequently need to access capital markets: See the Thai telecom company with debt maturities that need to be "rolled" in each of the next few years; we thus have a game theory situation with repeated iterations, so the parties involved can only screw each other over to a certain point! They know they have to play the game again soon. Equity deals are less like this. 

9) See also certain interesting agency problems here: say you work for a sell-side bond shop and your client (a company that wants to issue bonds) comes to you, thinking of doing a bond issue between October and December. Well, how does your P&L look? Is your bonus already set for this year? Then encourage the client to wait for January so that deal would show up in next year's bonus numbers--plus you start the year with a great-looking deal pipeline.

More Posts

Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications by Irving J. Good

This collection of scientific papers is a challenging but useful discussion on statistical methods, probability, randomness, logic and decision-making. Much of the book centers around Bayesian statistical methods and when and why to use them, as well as "philosophy of science"-type discussions on when a scientist should--or sometimes must--apply subjective judgments to scientific problems. It will help enormously if you've had a semester or two of statistics to really get at the meat of this book. If not, scroll down a few paragraphs for a short list of layperson-friendly books that address many of these subjects more accessibly. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] Author Irving Good worked with Alan Turing at ...
Read more

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker

Tedious, weak, and worst of all  "riddled" with errors  and oversights. Do not read. I recommend instead  Dreaming: A Very Short Introduction  by J. Allan Hobson  for information about the REM/dreaming stage of sleep, as well as  Restful Sleep  by Deepak Chopra  for readers interested in practical help for improving sleep quality. Unlike Why We Sleep , both of these books are short, direct, readable and clear. Sadly, I also have to spend a brief few sentences  on Alexey Guzey's devastating criticisms of this book . Alexey's entire post is very much worth reading, but if you want to see just one glaring example of atrocious academic ethics, you can start with a chart Matthew Walker uses in Chapter 6 to prove a linear relationship between sleep loss and sports injury-- except that he cuts off the part of the chart that disproves his argument . This is childish middle school stuff, way beneath the line of a Berkeley and Harvard professor, a...
Read more

Deep Response: An Emergency Education in Post-Consumer Praxis by Tyler Disney

Tremendously useful. This is a book about meta-preparation: about what it really means to be prepared when you don't know the future. It teaches readers how to think about skill development, optionality and flexibility--and by virtue of these meta-tools, how to earn true individual self-sovereignty. Deep Response is a sophisticated strategy-level discussion hidden in a simple story: a thirty-something man goes back in time to offer guidance to his twenty-something younger self. Their discussions are engrossing on many, many levels, as the two characters--with radically different perspectives, despite being the same person--work out various life problems. The older character wants to warn the younger man that all of his strivings will eventually cause him to achieve nearly the exact opposite of what he seeks, and worse, if he doesn't adjust, his life will soon lack enough flexibility to do anything about it. The reader is the lucky beneficiary, getting exposure to a wide-rangi...
Read more