Skip to main content

Journey Into Fear by Eric Ambler

Interesting spy thriller from 1939. I've been on a bit of a kick reading spy novels from different historical periods (see also John Buchan's 19-teens-era novels Greenmantle and The Thirty-Nine Steps) and I'm finding a tremendous, completely unexpected benefit: I learn more history from reading this sub-genre than from reading history itself!  

Journey Into Fear is set in pre-WWII Turkey, and it gives a reader context for a region of the world rarely talked about in standard Western histories of this era. Here you'll learn about the geopolitical dance between Turkey and Germany leading up to WWII, and you get a good feel for the tension in the air in the late 1930s throughout Europe. People knew that some kind of conflict--possibly a major one--was going to happen, but nobody knew when, where, who would be fighting, or who would be allied with who. It's all quite strikingly similar to today's era, with our proxy wars and shifting alliances, as a new post-American hegemony power structure takes shape.

This ain't Hemingway--it's good but not great literature. And the pacing is stately: readers accustomed to the formulaic pacing of Dumas (or, say, a modern reader used to Dan Brown) might even consider Journey Into Fear slow. But it also has some interesting proto-modern elements: the protagonist, for example, is sort of a dithering amateur, he's an engineer involved in developing naval guns, and he has no context (nor stomach, frankly) for spy work like murder and political intrigue. This isn't your suave James Bond: this guy is actually frightened and self-doubting as he tries his best to evade trained killers. Choosing an "average" protagonist like this is unusual and it adds (a little) to the tension.

I've now read two Eric Ambler books (I'll be writing up A Coffin for Dimitrios next, a better novel in my view), and candidly, they are both 3-ish (out of 5) star books. That's enough of a sample for me of this author.

More Posts

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain

Huckleberry Finn is really two books: a good one and a bad one. The good one, the first fifteen or sixteen chapters, is engaging, original and beautiful. The second book, the bad one, is hackneyed, inorganic, farcical, and in places nearly unreadable.  It feels like the overall work was written by two different people, which in fact it more or less was: the Mark Twain of 1876, fresh off the tremendous success of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, and the Mark Twain of seven years later, cramped with financial stress and writer's block. Thus the back two-thirds of the book feels more like a collection of vaguely related short stories than a coherent novel, with random characters entering and exiting the stage to resuscitate an increasingly cadaverous plot. Twain is even forced to wedge Tom Sawyer back into the story late in the book, thanks to one of American literature's least plausible coincidences. It brings to mind Virginia Woolf's famously condescending remark about the no...

Understanding Human Nature by Alfred Adler

A difficult book, in part because Adler isn't all that good at expressing his ideas: he's a practitioner, not a writer, and it shows. Further, I believe Understanding Human Nature has more in direct value than direct value: the reader has to move from what the book teaches to a layer of second-order insights. I'll explain what I mean in a moment. First a quick summary of the book's core themes and ideas. According to Adler, we all have a psyche, formed and largely fixed in childhood, and that psyche has an ulterior psychological goal. For most of us, unfortunately, that goal takes the form of striving for power, control, attention, or superiority. Throughout the book Adler gives examples where peoples' psyche-driven strivings cause suffering, both for themselves as well as everyone else in their blast radius. Most of us will likely resist Adler's claim that to understand other people and their motivations you must first understand their psyches' "ulter...

Godel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter

A wonderful, beautiful work. Ask me about it, and I'll start nattering at you about sphex wasps, fugues, isomorphisms and "jumping out of the system." And my voice will trail off and you'll see me get a faraway look in my eyes. It's actually quite difficult to describe what this book is about--at least, impossible to describe in a few short sentences. [1] But there are so many ways to read Godel, Escher, Bach , and such a wide range of ideas and insights one can get out of it, that it becomes a different book for every reader. And let me confess, if you haven't read GEB  yet, I am jealous of you. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] First of all this book can be understood on many levels. You can read it a...