Skip to main content

Journey Into Fear by Eric Ambler

Interesting spy thriller from 1939. I've been on a bit of a kick reading spy novels from different historical periods (see also John Buchan's 19-teens-era novels Greenmantle and The Thirty-Nine Steps) and I'm finding a tremendous, completely unexpected benefit: I learn more history from reading this sub-genre than from reading history itself!  

Journey Into Fear is set in pre-WWII Turkey, and it gives a reader context for a region of the world rarely talked about in standard Western histories of this era. Here you'll learn about the geopolitical dance between Turkey and Germany leading up to WWII, and you get a good feel for the tension in the air in the late 1930s throughout Europe. People knew that some kind of conflict--possibly a major one--was going to happen, but nobody knew when, where, who would be fighting, or who would be allied with who. It's all quite strikingly similar to today's era, with our proxy wars and shifting alliances, as a new post-American hegemony power structure takes shape.

This ain't Hemingway--it's good but not great literature. And the pacing is stately: readers accustomed to the formulaic pacing of Dumas (or, say, a modern reader used to Dan Brown) might even consider Journey Into Fear slow. But it also has some interesting proto-modern elements: the protagonist, for example, is sort of a dithering amateur, he's an engineer involved in developing naval guns, and he has no context (nor stomach, frankly) for spy work like murder and political intrigue. This isn't your suave James Bond: this guy is actually frightened and self-doubting as he tries his best to evade trained killers. Choosing an "average" protagonist like this is unusual and it adds (a little) to the tension.

I've now read two Eric Ambler books (I'll be writing up A Coffin for Dimitrios next, a better novel in my view), and candidly, they are both 3-ish (out of 5) star books. That's enough of a sample for me of this author.

More Posts

How to Survive and Thrive in the Coming Wave of Deflation by A. Gary Shilling

I'd like to accomplish two things with this review of a book that, frankly, isn't worth a close read. First, I'll briefly point to the specific sections of the book readers can skim to extract most of the book's value--see the next paragraph for that part. Second, I want to use this book--which is the macroeconomic prediction equivalent of a man with a hammer--to expose the "expert prediction" game and illustrate how dangerous it is to credulously follow so-called expert predictions, especially when it comes to stock markets and economics. We'll start with what to skip and skim. A time-constrained reader can extract 99% of the value of the book by skimming parts 3 and 4 (pages 209-331) and studying the two charts on pages 330 and 331, which spell out all the dos and don'ts for surviving deflation. Readers might also consider reading Chapter 15 for its discussion of the Kondratieff wave concept, a useful mental model for thinking about cyclicality in a...

Generative Energy: Restoring the Wholeness of Life by Ray Peat

A disorganized book by a highly-censored medical iconoclast. Despite its sloppiness, it will still send you down a lot of good rabbit holes. I don't recommend a labored, close reading of this book: just use it as an introduction to Ray Peat's dissident health and physiology ideas. In certain ways, we can think of Ray Peat, along with Robert Mendelsohn and Ivan Illich , as direct ancestors of the courageous COVID-era medical dissidents: doctors like Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Pierre Kory, Kirk and Kimberly Milhoan, Paul Marik, Meryl Nass and Peter Gotszche, among others, who bravely spoke out against foolish lockdowns, hospital protocols, government mandates and the use of risky (but of course highly lucrative) therapeutics like Remdesivir--and were censored, suspended or fired for it. [1] As a general rule: in any knowledge domain you should always know who the dissident thinkers are. They are usually the ones who were right all along. [2] [A quick  affiliate link ...

The Hunchback of Notre Dame by Victor Hugo (trans. Frederic Shoberl)

This is one of these novels that must be read, and as you read it, you'll feel sheepish that you haven't already read it. The French are lucky to have this author. I'll talk about the story itself shortly. But what surprises a modern reader most about The Hunchback of Notre Dame is how experimental it is, especially for its time. See for instance how Victor Hugo frequently breaks the fourth wall, or how he plays with the readers' perceptions of who, exactly, are the story's "good" and "bad" characters. The reader doesn't really see Claude Frollo for who he is until nearly halfway through the story, and on some level the story actually has multiple protagonists and antagonists, all sharing various and unusual allegiances to each other. Hunchback  of course has plenty of the usual 19th century novel characteristics, but also enough experimental qualities that I think it's fair to call this a proto-modern novel. What vastly separates this w...