Skip to main content

The Thirty-Nine Steps by John Buchan

Interesting on a few levels. It's always fun to read a thriller/spy novel from a completely different era (this book dates from the early years of WW1), because while you're reading something fun you also get a window into a different historical period, exposure to different slang and expressions, and direct context on social norms of that period. Good fiction reads well regardless of era, but the extra context adds to the satisfaction. 

Also interesting to think of protagonist Richard Hannay and what is it about him that's compelling. Not suave and elegant like James Bond, not huge and muscular like Jack Reacher, Hannay is sort of an everyman--admittedly with some unusual skills the author needs to make up from time to time to move the plot along! 

The Thirty-Nine Steps was popular right from publication, and it essentially made John Buchan's career as a writer.  

Finally, this edition, The Oxford World's Classics edition, contains quite a bit of useful biographical information about the author, as well as some helpful explanatory notes to the text to help the reader along in understanding obscure  references, words and placenames. Alongside this, however, is a typical "introductory essay" from some academic rando, which unfortunately reeks across its sixteen interminable pages like most second-rate literary criticism: pretentious, highly speculative, masturbatory, and worst of all, boring. It can be safely skipped.

To Read:
John Buchan's five "Richard Hannay" novels:
The Thirty-Nine Steps (1915)
Greenmantle (1916)
Mr. Standfast (1919)
The Three Hostages (1924)
The Courts of the Morning (1929)
See also the 1935 Hitchcock film of The Thirty-Nine Steps
Erskine Childer: The Riddle of the Sands
Patrick Beesly: Room 40: British Naval Intelligence, 1914-1918
John Buchan: History of the Great War (Vols 1-4)

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think