Skip to main content

Three Ring Circus by Jeff Pearlman

A good documentary of the dysfunctions that can strike any organization with star employees, and as such this book is both entertaining sports history and useful business history. 

All work teams have jealousies and dramas, but this team had prima donnas all the way down, starting with two all-time MVP prima donnas: Shaquille O'Neal and Kobe Bryant, whose mutual antagonism broke apart what could have been one of the most dominant teams in sports history.

Notes: 
* "You bring glory to this redneck, one-horse town, and this is what they think of you? Get out as soon as you can. Fuck these people." Charles Barkley to Shaquille O'Neal on his treatment by the Orlando, FL community.  

* "Look at all these people laughing at you. One day we're going to get them back." Shaq to Kobe after Kobe as a rookie launched four straight air balls at the end of a critical playoff game loss, ending the Lakers' season.

* The author wrote this book with more confidence than his prior book Showtime, but the reader is the loser for it. In Three Ring Circus he flings an unfunny witticism at the reader every few pages; see for example this unfortunate dangling modifier: "At the same time the Lakers were trying to make sure Rodman wasn't lying dead in a gutter with three hookers and a needle protruding from his left nipple."

* Kobe as a juvenile narcissist per Phil Jackson, uncoachable, has all the answers, will not listen to anyone, etc. At the same time, he's an unbelievably hard worker, training and working on his game constantly. 

* Fascinating and disturbing to see Kobe's astoundingly naive behavior in front of the Colorado police during sexual assault allegations. Note that the police flat out lied to him without any consequences, but the reverse was not true:


* If you are ever unfortunate enough to find yourself under investigation by law enforcement, the Kobe rape trial gives tremendous advice on what not to do and say. 

* Hard not to have extra respect for (or fear of?) Vanessa Williams after reading this, she was trying to track down her then-husband, Laker forward Rick Fox: 


* And then, depressingly, after three consecutive NBA championships, this entire superteam just disintegrated, with Kobe "I'm tired of being a sidekick" Bryant in conflict with nearly all his teammates, with Shaq leaving the team unable to work with Kobe, with coach Phil Jackson getting fired and then writing a tell-all book right after... the whole thing became a wrecked monument to Kobe's self-absorption.

* Finally, note this book had already been written (and was scheduled for publication) shortly before Kobe Bryant's death. This book is about the young, narcissistic, immature, foolish, arrogant and uncoachable Kobe Bryant, not the statesman-like Kobe Bryant he later grew into. 

To Read: 
Del Harris: On Point, also Winning Defense
Jerry West: West By West
Vanessa Williams: You Have No Idea
Phil Jackson: The Last Season, also Sacred Hoops
Kent Babb: Not a Game: The Incredible Rise and Unthinkable Fall of Allen Iverson
See also: Shaq's surprisingly good freestyle about Kobe Bryant 

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think