Skip to main content

Open by Andre Agassi

When was the last time you read a sports biography that wasn't completely narcissistic? When was the last time you read any biography and laughed out loud--repeatedly? And most important, when was the last time you found a book that you simply could not put down?

Open is the best sports biography I've ever read. By light years. It makes "autobiographies" like Charles Barkley's Outrageous! (which Barkley famously claimed he never read) seem puerile, and it makes relatively intelligent books like Kareem Abdul Jabbar's Giant Steps or Vince: A Personal Biography of Vince Lombardi seem pale and pointless by comparison. I was able to put those books down. Not Agassi's.

Why do I read biographies? To learn lessons from other peoples' lives that I can apply to my own. To learn behavior I can model--or avoid. To understand the struggles and challenges of another person's life and use that understanding to help cope with the struggles and challenges of my own. And, admittedly, I read biographies to be entertained.

That's why this book was such a profound pleasure to read. It gives you all of these things. And you don't even need to be a rabid tennis fan (like I am) to enjoy this book. You just need to empathize with a guy who struggles to figure out his life and purpose. It's almost secondary that he happens to be one of the most talented tennis players in history.

A few comments on the controversies in Open. Much has been made about how badly Agassi treats Pete Sampras in the book--how Sampras is boring, how he's a lousy tipper, how he says and does nothing interesting.

The thing is, Agassi says this with a grudging admiration. He wished he could be more like Sampras during his playing days. He just couldn't. He simply hated the game of tennis too much. Also, the allegation about tipping actually came from Agassi's coach at the time, Brad Gilbert--Agassi simply retells an amusing story about how he and Gilbert learned about it.

It's also worth thinking a bit more deeply about many of the other controversies in the book, including Agassi's methamphetamine use and subsequent lies to tennis authorities, his sarcastic (and hilarious) jabs at Michael Chang's self-righteous Christianity, and his squirmingly candid description of the decline and failure of his ill-thought out marriage to Brooke Shields.

Why would Agassi include all of this? Why not just say only good things about his fellow players and girlfriends? Why make himself risk looking like a jerk when he could easily sanitize these passages? There would still be hundreds of hilarious and engrossing anecdotes left for readers to enjoy, and the book would still sell very well.

I think he sincerely wanted to do his best to make an honest and painfully accurate accounting of his life. We should all own up to our lives this way.

Highly, highly recommended.

More Posts

A Technique for Producing Ideas by James Webb Young

It's a rare pleasure to find so many insights in such a short book. A modern reader can't help but notice the stark contrast between A Technique for Producing Ideas  and most modern books, which might have a few paragraphs' worth of insights, but yet always seem to be fluffed and padded out to at least 200-300 pages. The author gives away a formula for creativity and idea generation that is simple, but not easy. And as a result almost no one will follow it. In the author's own one-paragraph summary, his process is: * First, the gathering of raw materials--both the materials of your immediate problem and the materials which come from a constant enrichment of your store of general knowledge.  * Second, the working over of these materials in your mind.  * Third, the incubating stage, where you let something beside the conscious mind do the work of synthesis.  * Fourth, the actual birth of the Idea--the 'Eureka! I have it!' stage. * And fifth, the final shaping and ...

The Genesis of Russophobia in Great Britain by John H. Gleason

In-depth (and surprisingly interesting!) analysis of the shifting public and government opinion on Russia during late 18th and early/mid 19th century England, plus a useful (and telling) exploration of the various propaganda and media narratives used to drive these opinions. I've written before on this site, many times, that history rhymes, it doesn't repeat exactly, so you have to know your history--and by this I mean know your actual history, not your country's preferred propaganda narrative of history--in order to see that rhyme to make useful, accurate predictions. It is fascinating to see England in the 1800s applying various forms of the same propagandized and manufactured Russophobia that we see in the United States today. England went from a literal  alliance with Russia (against Napoleonic France) to a state of paranoid loathing of Russia in a matter of decades; the USA likewise went from " aren't they our friends now? " after the Soviet collapse to...

The Design of Everyday Things by Don Norman

This looks like a book about foundational concepts of good design, but in reality it's a deep and intelligent book addressing a tremendous range of topics: psychology, cognition, on minding details, on being "meta" about rules and procedures, even how to navigate the modern world. One of the most valuable and interesting books I've read all year. Pair with  The Upper Half of the Motorcycle by Bernt Spiegel.  Notes:  [Warning: Long] 0) Norman's Law : the day the product team is announced, it is behind schedule and over its budget. Ch 1: The Psychopathology of Everyday Things 1) "Norman doors" confusing doors, or doors that don't work right. "The design of the door should indicate how to work it without any need for signs, certainly without any need for trial and error." 2) "Two of the most important characteristics of redesign are discoverability and understanding. * Discoverability : Is it possible to even figure out what actions are...