Skip to main content

Your Invisible Power by Genevieve Behrend

You are not a victim of the universe, but a part of it.
--from Your Invisible Power, by Genevieve Behrend

I've written before that Rhonda Byrne's The Secret left me somewhat disappointed with its derivative nature and overall superficiality, so I thought I'd attempt to go deeper into The Secret's subject matter by reading some of the primary texts Byrne used. I started with Your Invisible Power by Genevieve Behrend.

Unfortunately, it was nearly incomprehensible.

Not completely incomprehensible, mind you, but close. And while there's a lot of wisdom in this brief book, you'll need to wade through a fair amount of incoherent writing to get to it. It's a shame, because I think this book could be much better than it is--and if it were a better book, more people could get more value out of its pages. With that in mind, I'll try to help readers along by providing a brief roadmap of the best way to read Your Invisible Power.

First, do not start at the beginning! Start with Chapters 8, 9 and 10. This portion of the book gives the background of Behrend's search for meaning in life and her attempts to become a pupil of Judge Thomas Troward, who was her era's best known proponent of the so-called school of New Thought and the author of The Edinburgh Lectures on Mental Science.

The story of how she managed to secure a teacher-student relationship with Troward--a bizarre tale which includes a French astrologer, a Persian cat and the Book of Revelations--is alone worth the price of admission, and it gives important context strangely missing from the beginning of her book. Read these later chapters first, return safely to Chapter 1, and you'll find the book a lot less incoherent.

Finally, you can completely skip the final two chapters, 16 and 17, which appear to be nothing more than unstructured notes. Weirdly, these chapters give readers the surreal impression that Behrend left her book unfinished.

Once again, it's unfortunate that a helpful book, addressing many of the principles and mechanics of visualization and the Law of Attraction, had to be written so poorly. There is a lot of value hidden away in these pages, but, sadly, few readers today will have the patience to dig for it.

One other thought: gullible and credulous readers often mistakenly believe an inscrutable book requires study, as if the book's inscrutability is the fault of the reader, not the author. Don't be trapped by this mindset. Read Your Invisible Power according to my road map, get what you can out of it, and always remember that all authors have an enormous obligation to their readers to state their views as clearly and unconfusingly as possible.

Ironically, I'm starting to become thankful that The Secret's Rhonda Byrne borrowed many of Behrend's principles of visualization in this book in her (as I condescendingly put it) derivative work. Rhonda did us all a bigger favor than I thought by transforming these ideas into coherent prose.

In the coming weeks, I'll be reading a few more of the source texts Byrne used, again to see if the ideas borrowed throughout The Secret are addressed with more substance and more originality. For now, however, I'm seriously rethinking The Secret's value as a clearly-written, if simple, Cliff Notes version of the entire New Thought movement.

A final note: Your Invisible Power is in the public domain, so while you are perfectly free to pay a nominal cost for the physical book at Amazon (and support my blogging efforts while you're at it!), you can also obtain an electronic version of the book at no cost here and here.

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s

Net Wars by Wendy M. Grossman

Workmanlike book about the early Usenet message boards that made up much of the internet's landscape in the early- to mid-1990s. While it offers helpful analogies for certain internet controversies today, I'd only recommend it to serious internet history geeks. It's not interesting enough of a read for the casual reader. However, books on technology ( and investing ) from past periods can offer surprisingly useful insights for current-day readers. The flame wars of the early days of Usenet rhyme with today's malevolently sarcastic social media arguments. Censorship battles of the 1990s give us a tiny hint of what they look like now. Spam, surveillance--we are grappling with the same problems today, just in far more extensive forms.  And then again, there are some issues that seemed like a really big deal to everyone back then that, once enough time passes, end up hardly mattering at all. I wonder what things we think matter today that don't, and what things we think