Skip to main content

New Think: The Use of Lateral Thinking in the Generation of New Ideas by Edward de Bono

It's 19th century England, and you're the beautiful daughter of a man deeply in debt. The man's moneylender, an old and repulsive man, offers a deal: Let me marry your daughter and I'll forgive all the debt. You'll be spared going to prison, and your daughter won't starve.

The man and his daughter were horrified. To convince them, the moneylender proposed letting fate decide the matter. He told them he would put a black pebble and a white pebble in a bag, and the girl would pick one of the pebbles at random. If she chose the white pebble, the debt would be cancelled and she could stay with her father. If she chose the black pebble, she would become the moneylender's wife and the debt would be cancelled.

Seeing no alternative, they reluctantly agreed. As they were standing on a path strewn with pebbles, the moneylender bent to pick up two to put into the bag.

Unfortunately, the alert girl saw to her horror that he selected two black pebbles to put into the bag.


**************************
If you were this girl, what would you do?

And this is how New Think: The Use of Lateral Thinking in the Generation of New Ideas begins. Author Edward de Bono compares and contrasts what he calls vertical thinking (traditional thought processes which use logic and reasonable assumptions, seen by many as the only form of "respectable" thinking) to what he calls lateral thinking, which involves looking at a subject in unusual, illogical and even irrational ways to arrive at more creative solutions.

If lateral thinking, rather than vertical thinking, is the source of most of the world's brilliant insights and inventions, how can you train yourself to use it to your advantage, especially when it seems this type of thinking often occurs by accident or pure chance? de Bono describes several techniques you can use, such as chance, games, random associations and other approaches, to harvest ideas and achieve greater creativity.

There are some true jewels of insight in this brief 156-page book. Unfortunately, you've got to wade through quite a bit of passive voice and convoluted phrasing to get to them. I wish that this author, who is such a champion of counterintuitive thinking, had just this once reached a more traditional conclusion: that his ideas would find a larger audience if they were better organized and more clearly articulated.

Furthermore, many of these concepts are described much more engagingly in books like Blink and The Black Swan. I'd start with those books first, and if the subject matter truly interests you, then you can move on to New Think.

***************************
Here's the conclusion to the story of the moneylender and the beautiful daughter:

The daughter gritted her teeth, reached into the bag, and pulled out a pebble. But before she opened her hand and looked at it, she casually dropped it on the ground, where it was immediately lost among all the other pebbles on the path.

"Oh, how clumsy of me!" she said. "But never mind--if you look into the bag you will be able to tell which pebble I took by the color of the one that is left."

The banker, unable to protest because it would prove his dishonesty, had no choice but to cancel the debt and let the girl stay with her father.

More Posts

Hot, Flat and Crowded by Thomas Friedman

I've now read three of Thomas Friedman's books, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, The World Is Flat, and now, Hot, Flat, and Crowded. And Hot Flat and Crowded is--by far--the weakest book of the three. In fact, a cynic might consider it more of a brand extension than a book--a recycling of The World is Flat to include well-meaning and repetitive chapters on energy policy, the environment and global warming. And despite his earnest and palliative writing tone, Friedman's political message has become shrill, and that shrillness debases many of the potentially intriguing ideas and arguments he makes throughout the book. According to Friedman, everything is the Americans' fault. We're supposed to be leaders of the free world, yet we should only act with the consensus blessing of all the rest of the world's countries. We invaded Iraq, which was wrong. We invaded Afghanistan, which was sort of right, but we're making far too many mistakes there. We don't educat...

How to Make Money in Any Market by Jim Cramer

Not Cramer's best, although there are insights here. I recommend instead two of Cramer's earlier works: Real Money: Sane Investing in an Insane World  and Getting Back to Even . The central idea in  How to Make Money in Any Market  is to structure your portfolio with roughly half of your assets in a low-fee S&P 500 index fund, and roughly the other half in five or so carefully researched "hero" stocks that are meant to be long-term secular growers and compounders over time. A remaining sliver of your portfolio should be in some sort of hedge: gold or Bitcoin [1] . Chapter 7 walks readers through this elegant portfolio structure. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] The books' weaknesses show u...

Solaris by Stanislaw Lem

Fascinating and challenging 1960s-era sci-fi about the incredible, even unimaginable, difficulties involved in first contact between civilizations. The planet Solaris features a strange, tissue-like surface that usually acts like a liquid, but can also spontaneously form all sorts of shapes and geological formations. It has been studied and debated over by generations of Earth scientists, many of whom believe the planet itself exhibits a form of intelligence, perhaps even consciousness and self-awareness.   Unlike TV sci-fi, where aliens always seem to be other actors wearing bumpy rubber foreheads who all somehow speak great English, this is "hard-science" sci-fi, and it traffics in the much more plausible notion that an alien species would have an intelligence so radically different from ours that we might never understand it. Author Stanislaw Lem tells the story in a nested and indirect fashion, reminding the reader a bit of Mary Shelley's  Frankenstein . The reader ...