Skip to main content

Walking by Henry David Thoreau [review short]

A short ramble of a book. Thoreau's thoughts come and go, tangents form and disappear, just as your own thoughts amble and wander while walking. In fact, Walking makes you want to go for a walk, and during it good ideas will come to you if you let them.[*] 

Thoreau struggled with modernity even back in 1860s-era Massachusetts. It's the same struggle. There's too much work/spend cycle, too much consumerism, too much development, not enough nature, not enough peace and quiet. But when Thoreau writes "I can easily walk ten, fifteen, twenty, any number of miles, commencing at my own door, without going by any house, without crossing a road except where the fox and the mink do: first along the river, and then the brook, and then the meadow and the wood-side. There are square miles in my vicinity which have no inhabitant" you can't help but think mournfully about the sheer density, traffic, overdevelopment and all the other problems of modernity in Massachusetts today. "Civilization" continues to domesticate us, gnawing away at our spirits and our souls.

[*] Nietzsche put it much more forcefully: "Never trust a thought that occurs to you indoors." I stumbled onto this wonderful quote in Bronze Age Mindset, a book of genuine samizdat literature I'll review shortly.

Notes:
* Etymology of the word sauntering, starting from people in France begging for funds "to go to Sainte-Terre" (the Holy Land) such that children would say "there goes a Sainte-Terrer" which evolved into a saunterer, a Holy-Lander. Likely one of those etymologies that probably isn't true but really feels like it should be. 

* "I think that I cannot preserve my health and spirits, unless I spend four hours a day at least--and it is commonly more than that--sauntering through the woods and over the hills and fields, absolutely free from all worldly engagements..." 

* "When a traveler asked Wordsworth's servant to show him her master's study, she answered, 'Here is his library, but his study is out of doors.'"

* You can't help but get mournful about the immense amount of open space in 1862 Massachusetts compared to now. "I can easily walk ten, fifteen, twenty, any number of miles, commencing at my own door, without going by any house, without crossing a road except where the fox and the mink do: first along the river, and then the brook, and then the meadow and the wood-side. There are square miles in my vicinity which have no inhabitant."

* See Thoreau's poem (and not a bad one!) "The Old Marlborough Road"

* For whatever reason he always seems to walk southwest, he doesn't know why, "Eastward I go only by force, but westward I go free." It sounds like a metaphor for the United States on some level as we chase freedom by moving west. "I must walk toward Oregon, and not toward Europe. And that way the nation is moving, and I may say that mankind progresses from east to west."

* Thoreau on the all-too-temporary idea of American liberty, an increasingly fictional idea even in 1862: "Perchance, when, in the course of ages, American liberty has become a fiction of the past--as it is to some extent a fiction of the present--the poets of the world will be inspired by American mythology."

* I can't stand the word "methinks"--unfortunately Thoreau uses it every few pages. 

* Interesting epistemological musings here: on how "a man accumulates a myriad facts, lays them up in his memory" but then this declarative knowledge is like eating hay in a barn, it's not the real knowledge of being out in nature eating grass in the fields. He is scratching at the idea of distinguishing between trying to know something through mental concepts and verbal representations ("...a sudden revelation of the insufficiency of all that we called Knowledge before") versus knowing something through direct experience: See also this quote: "A man's ignorance sometimes is not only useful, but beautiful--while his knowledge, so called, is oftentimes worse than useless, besides being ugly. Which is the best man to deal with--he who knows nothing about a subject, and, what is extremely rare, knows that he knows nothing, or he who really knows something about it, but thinks that he knows all?" 

* A cute little anecdote here where Thoreaus climbs a tall white pine for the first time (and "got well pitched"), discovers "a few minute and delicate red cone-like blossoms, the fertile flower of the white pine" at the very top of the tree, and brings them into town to show off to total strangers: "not one had ever seen the like before, but they wondered as at a star dropped down." Kind of hilarious if you think about it realistically: Thoreau, a kook woodsman known for living in a shack by the pond, wanders into town showing everybody some little flowers that he picked? You can't help but chuckle happily at this scenelet.

Vocab: 
Vespertinal: active in the evening; "vespertine flowers"
Ferity: being feral; the state of being wild or uncultivated; savagery; ferocity
Embayed: formed into bays; hollowed out by the sea; "an embayed coastline"
Musquash: archaic term for muskrat

More Posts

Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications by Irving J. Good

This collection of scientific papers is a challenging but useful discussion on statistical methods, probability, randomness, logic and decision-making. Much of the book centers around Bayesian statistical methods and when and why to use them, as well as "philosophy of science"-type discussions on when a scientist should--or sometimes must--apply subjective judgments to scientific problems. It will help enormously if you've had a semester or two of statistics to really get at the meat of this book. If not, scroll down a few paragraphs for a short list of layperson-friendly books that address many of these subjects more accessibly. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] Author Irving Good worked with Alan Turing at ...

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker

Tedious, weak, and worst of all  "riddled" with errors  and oversights. Do not read. I recommend instead  Dreaming: A Very Short Introduction  by J. Allan Hobson  for information about the REM/dreaming stage of sleep, as well as  Restful Sleep  by Deepak Chopra  for readers interested in practical help for improving sleep quality. Unlike Why We Sleep , both of these books are short, direct, readable and clear. Sadly, I also have to spend a brief few sentences  on Alexey Guzey's devastating criticisms of this book . Alexey's entire post is very much worth reading, but if you want to see just one glaring example of atrocious academic ethics, you can start with a chart Matthew Walker uses in Chapter 6 to prove a linear relationship between sleep loss and sports injury-- except that he cuts off the part of the chart that disproves his argument . This is childish middle school stuff, way beneath the line of a Berkeley and Harvard professor, a...

Ghost Boy by Martin Pistorius

Read this book and you'll never complain, ever, about anything. Imagine being trapped in a vegetative body but with full cognition and awareness. You can hear, see and understand everything, but you can't move or do anything. Everyone around you--your family, your caregivers, everyone--thinks you're a literal vegetable. And some of those around you will act like it, having insulting conversations about you while you're right there. Some caregivers--not all of them, mercifully--will handle you like a slab of meat. Occasionally you'll be rolled over to a performative "activity" in which a caregiver drags your fingerpainted hand across a paper, so your care facility can show your family you aren't spending all day staring at the wall. But yet you do spend most of your time staring at the wall, or worse, watching Barney . You will come to hate Barney with all your soul. Imagine living like this. For years . Until one caregiver really looks at you, really...