Skip to main content

Range by David Epstein

If you like Malcolm Gladwell-style writing you'll like this book: it has lots of often cutesy, counter-intuitive stories and plenty of "studies show" scientific studies that prove the author's points (naturally) throughout. It makes the book a diverting and easy read. Plenty of ideas in here to think about too if you'd like to get better at courting serendipity and insight in your day-to-day and/or professional life. All in all, a fairly useful book. 

Notes: 
* Kind learning environments (chess) versus wicked learning environments (reality). 

* Cognitive entrenchment 

* Rule seeking behavior... Learning by multiple choice or if/then statements. Why giving hints or supplying rules does not help you learn, where the appearance of learning isn't actual learning. 

* "Easy learning" versus more "difficult learning," where more difficult learning actually sticks. 

* Your perceptions of your own learning can be misleading. if it seems like it's easy, like you're making rapid progress, you're most likely not learning as well as you think. 

* "Far transfer": a knowledge structure that is so flexible that it can be applied effectively even in new domains or extremely novel situations. 

* Thinking analogically. Kepler using analogies.

* Career and job "match quality," how the army had trouble keeping people "matched" to careers that suited them or challenged them. Why it's important to have the ability to switch jobs or fields. 

* "You have to carry a big basket to bring something home" [This goes toward open-mindedness, can you think broadly, how much can you "enlarge" your basket?]

* Serendipitous "outside thinking" to arrive at solutions. "Lateral thinking with withered technology": Gunpei Yokoi at Nintendo, making games out of very old tech materials. 

* The "perverse inverse relationship" between fame and prediction accuracy. Yet another reason to ignore media pundits!! 

* "Dropping your tools" as metaphor for cognitive flexibility in wicked learning environments: firefighters, NASA engineers, etc.

More Posts

The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb

"What is this book about? It is about the taking of collateral, all of it, the end game of this globally synchronous debt accumulation super cycle. This is being executed by long-planned, intelligent design, the audacity and scope of which is difficult for the mind to encompass. Included are all financial assets, all money on deposit at banks, all stocks and bonds, and hence, all underlying property of all public corporations, including all inventories, plant and equipment, land, mineral deposits, inventions and intellectual property. Privately owned personal and real property financed with any amount of debt will be similarly taken, as will the assets of privately owned businesses, which have been financed with debt. If even partially successful, this will be the greatest conquest and subjugation in world history." Sometimes a book hits you with a central idea that seems at first so preposterously unlikely that you can't help but laugh out loud (as I did) and think, &quo

The Shipping Man by Matthew McCleery

A must-read for shipping investors--and even if you're not, it will likely make one out of you. It's a fun story, hilarious at times, and it teaches readers all kinds of nuances about investing. Our main character, running his own little hedge fund, finds out by pure accident that the Baltic Dry Index is down 97% (!) over the course of just three months. It makes him curious, and this curiosity takes him on a downright Dantean journey through the shipping industry.  He's outwitted left and right: first by savvy bankers in Germany, then by even savvier Greeks. And then, in an awful moment of weakness, he gets lured into buying a "tramp" (a very old, nearly used-up ship needing massive repairs) at what seems like a good price. The industry nearly eats this guy alive more than once, but he comes out the other end a true Shipping Man.  This should be mandatory reading for MBA students. I think back to all the terminally boring "case studies" I had to read ov

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s