Skip to main content

Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health by Ivan Illich

This book was profoundly useful, giving me a set of extraordinarily helpful lenses to better understand both the modern medical/healthcare industry, but also to better understand modernity itself. Although this book is primarily about healthcare, it is also prescient in identifying many of the alienating and atomizing aspects of modern civilization. This book may have been written in the early 1970s, but the author was decades ahead of his time.

One of the foundational concepts of this book is iatrogenesis, which essentially means “harm done by the healer.” I was first exposed to this word thanks to Nassim Taleb in his book Antifragile. In Medical Nemesis, Ivan Illich begins with a discussion of medical iatrogenics in the most basic sense, but then expands the concept into far broader terms, discussing three genres of iatrogenesis: 1) clinical iatrogenesis, 2) social iatrogenesis, and 3) cultural iatrogenesis: 

1) Clinical iatrogenesis is the “plain vanilla form” of iatrogenesis: damage done to a patient by a doctor. It can be caused by doctor incompetence, by accident, by a doctor to protect his own legal liability (by ordering tests or procedures that may or may not be necessary to the patient but serve to cover the doctor's legal risk), or by unknown reasons. 

2) Social iatrogenesis is a form of damage done when the medical practice or our government encourages or reinforces society to become greater and greater over-consumers of healthcare. This can come from overscreening, overmedicating, from disease-mongering or from labeling people as sick who may not actually be. This includes “breeding” new categories of patients, who can then be encouraged to pay for meds or treatment to “fix” them. Also, we are subject to various grooming practices, even from childhood, to encourage us to tolerate various behaviors: doctors who “use a foreign language” (medical terminology) while they discuss our case right in front of us; doctors who may perform tests or perform actions (even pain-inducing actions) without explanation or apology, etc.

3) Cultural iatrogenesis is when the healthcare industry interferes with people's potential to deal on their own with human weakness and vulnerability. Examples might be: interfering in healthy responses to suffering and impairment. Or, undermining the individual’s ability to face their reality and accept inevitable decline and death. Think of it like a second-order iatrogenesis that sickens and weakens us culturally. 

The modern phrase “evidence-based healthcare”--widely used by healthcare evangelists and propagandists--should trigger alarm bells in the mind of any competent critical thinker. Once anyone has even the most basic familiarly with the great crisis of reproducibility, to say nothing of the various other problems suffusing all “studies show” science findings (p-hacking, file drawer effects, statistical gerrymandering, overdependence on Gaussian/normal curve statistical analysis, etc.), one cannot no longer hear the words “evidence-based healthcare” without a sense of bitter irony. 

In the modern era we are trained to use money as a solution for everything, including our health. Thus we pay for meds, doctor’s appointments, surgeries, insurance... while we demand more and more government support and funding for “healthcare.” All of this, circularly, simply contributes to the desire to buy our way out of all situations, including buying our way out of reality--and even out of death itself. And of course along the way we have become an enormously overmedicated society. 

I also wonder what this author would think--as he laments the upward explosion of healthcare spending from 4% of GDP in the 1960s to 8% in the 1970s--to know that today healthcare costs exceed 20% of GDP (!) as life expectancy and life quality are actually declining.

It is slowly becoming clear to me that iatrogenesis is a feature, not a bug, of modern healthcare--and possibly of modern society in general. It is endemic in many more ways than we realize. And once you can “see” iatrogenics, you can never unsee it.

More Posts

Capital Returns: Investing Through the Capital Cycle: A Money Manager’s Reports 2002-15 [Edward Chancellor, Editor]

A collection of essays, culled from Marathon Asset Management's letters to clients, unified into what turns out to be an uneven book: useful in places, nearly useless in others. However, it offers readers good insights on how to think long term about investing in stocks, and the "capital cycle" (which I'll explain in the next paragraph) is an extraordinarily useful paradigm for investors. So what is the "capital cycle," and how do you invest "through" it? Essentially, all companies have capacity decisions to make, all the time. They have to expand capacity to meet market demand (or contract if there's a decline in demand), and they also have to game theory out what their competitors are thinking about their capacity. Every industry has its own dynamics, of course, but when an industry is in oversupply (in other words it has too much capacity), business quickly becomes terrible, earnings drop, and stock prices go down. And when the reverse is t...

Athanasius: the Life of Antony (Vita Antonii) and the Letter to Marcellinus

The first few centuries of Christianity offer an opportunity to learn about another period of great upheaval, an era when political, philosophical--and in this particular case, religious doctrinal differences--pulled society apart. As always, the past gives us guidance for navigating the upheaval of today. Athanasius' biography (actually hagiography) of Antony is on one level an extended Holy Desert Fathers reading. Antony was a desert OG, and there are wonderful discussions here on the beautiful early Christian ideals of prudence, justice, hospitality, temperance, courage, asceticism, on concern for the poor, on developing freedom from anger. In today's increasingly irreligious era, as the State becomes our "deity," these ideals are in steady decline. On another level, this work is also a piece of propaganda, using the life of a saint to make a doctrinal argument. Athanasius uses Antony as a mouthpiece to defend the Nicene doctrine of the Trinity, and attack the het...

The Day of the Barbarians by Alessandro Barbero

Excellent, readable short history of the battle of Adrianople, setting it in context of the final decades of the Western Roman Empire. Worth reading in particular for valuable historical context for the various fiscal, monetary and immigration policies the USA has embraced over the past few generations. At a certain point in Rome's historical arc, its leaders discovered that it could use barbarians as low cost labor and low cost military manpower. Further, both immigration and a type of what we might call "loose fiscal policy" could be powerful tools Roman elites could use to retain power and maintain the status quo that so enriched them at the expense of the peasantry. As the saying goes, history never repeats, but it sure rhymes. And it is incredibly disturbing to see policy decisions in 300-400 AD Rome--right before its collapse--that "rhyme" so well with various fiscal, monetary and immigration policies in place here and now in the USA. Striking.  Finally, o...