Skip to main content

Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health by Ivan Illich

This book was profoundly useful, giving me a set of extraordinarily helpful lenses to better understand both the modern medical/healthcare industry, but also to better understand modernity itself. Although this book is primarily about healthcare, it is also prescient in identifying many of the alienating and atomizing aspects of modern civilization. This book may have been written in the early 1970s, but the author was decades ahead of his time.

One of the foundational concepts of this book is iatrogenesis, which essentially means “harm done by the healer.” I was first exposed to this word thanks to Nassim Taleb in his book Antifragile. In Medical Nemesis, Ivan Illich begins with a discussion of medical iatrogenics in the most basic sense, but then expands the concept into far broader terms, discussing three genres of iatrogenesis: 1) clinical iatrogenesis, 2) social iatrogenesis, and 3) cultural iatrogenesis: 

1) Clinical iatrogenesis is the “plain vanilla form” of iatrogenesis: damage done to a patient by a doctor. It can be caused by doctor incompetence, by accident, by a doctor to protect his own legal liability (by ordering tests or procedures that may or may not be necessary to the patient but serve to cover the doctor's legal risk), or by unknown reasons. 

2) Social iatrogenesis is a form of damage done when the medical practice or our government encourages or reinforces society to become greater and greater over-consumers of healthcare. This can come from overscreening, overmedicating, from disease-mongering or from labeling people as sick who may not actually be. This includes “breeding” new categories of patients, who can then be encouraged to pay for meds or treatment to “fix” them. Also, we are subject to various grooming practices, even from childhood, to encourage us to tolerate various behaviors: doctors who “use a foreign language” (medical terminology) while they discuss our case right in front of us; doctors who may perform tests or perform actions (even pain-inducing actions) without explanation or apology, etc.

3) Cultural iatrogenesis is when the healthcare industry interferes with people's potential to deal on their own with human weakness and vulnerability. Examples might be: interfering in healthy responses to suffering and impairment. Or, undermining the individual’s ability to face their reality and accept inevitable decline and death. Think of it like a second-order iatrogenesis that sickens and weakens us culturally. 

The modern phrase “evidence-based healthcare”--widely used by healthcare evangelists and propagandists--should trigger alarm bells in the mind of any competent critical thinker. Once anyone has even the most basic familiarly with the great crisis of reproducibility, to say nothing of the various other problems suffusing all “studies show” science findings (p-hacking, file drawer effects, statistical gerrymandering, overdependence on Gaussian/normal curve statistical analysis, etc.), one cannot no longer hear the words “evidence-based healthcare” without a sense of bitter irony. 

In the modern era we are trained to use money as a solution for everything, including our health. Thus we pay for meds, doctor’s appointments, surgeries, insurance... while we demand more and more government support and funding for “healthcare.” All of this, circularly, simply contributes to the desire to buy our way out of all situations, including buying our way out of reality--and even out of death itself. And of course along the way we have become an enormously overmedicated society. 

I also wonder what this author would think--as he laments the upward explosion of healthcare spending from 4% of GDP in the 1960s to 8% in the 1970s--to know that today healthcare costs exceed 20% of GDP (!) as life expectancy and life quality are actually declining.

It is slowly becoming clear to me that iatrogenesis is a feature, not a bug, of modern healthcare--and possibly of modern society in general. It is endemic in many more ways than we realize. And once you can “see” iatrogenics, you can never unsee it.

More Posts

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator by Edwin Lefevre [fictionalized bio of Jesse Livermore]

"History repeats itself all the time in Wall Street." A fictionalized biography of Jesse Livermore, one of history's most famous speculators. This is an enriching book, worth reading every decade or so across your investment career. And it's a genuinely fun read, conveying the free-wheeling investment culture of the days before the Securities and Exchange Act. When you're young and beginning to invest, this book thrills you with all the bravado of speculating. When you're older, after you've seen a few things and learned many of the manipulations and other techniques the investment industry uses to extract money from you, the book becomes more of a cautionary tale of things not to do, traps not to step in, things to avoid. This is the third time I've read this book (I'm now in my fourth decade as an investor, so I guess that makes me one reading behind schedule), and what struck me most this time around was Livermore's self-admitted weaknesses:...

The Retirement Myth by Craig S. Karpel

A 1995-era book for Boomers by a pre-Boomer (the author is technically a tail-end Silent, but he writes and thinks like a Boomer) who is dismayed at the Boomers' complete unpreparedness as they Boom their way towards an imaginary retirement in a system the author thinks is about to collapse.  Let's get the bottom line out of the way. This is a bad and boring book with incontinent logic.  Then why read it? You  don't have to, and shouldn't. But I often review bad books as an intellectual exercise: to think about what is wrong with a book, what should and should not have been done in writing it, where the errors (of, say, conception, of structure, of logic, of rhetoric) are, and so on. And with books that make predictions, it's a glorious opportunity to practice epistemic humility to read that book after its predictions should have (but didn't) come true. Finally, you can mine even the worst books for useful insights--or in this case contra-insights, since the in...

Confessions of a Medical Heretic by Robert S. Mendelsohn, MD

"I have written this book precisely to scare and to radicalize people before they are hurt. Let this book be your radicalizing experience." The more I come into contact with modern medicine, the more I've watched my elders' lives intersect with it, the more I've observed the field's neomania and accompanying iatrogenic harms, the more I realize that everyone--everyone!--should read the following four books: H. Gilbert Welch: Less Medicine, More Health Ivan Illich: Medical Nemesis Dr. John Sarno: The Divided Mind Robert S. Mendelsohn: Confessions of a Medical Heretic While reading these works, it will be worth noting your internal reaction to them. Do you agree? Do you strongly reject? Why? And what might this indicate about your attachment to your existing beliefs about medicine? In Confession of a Medical Heretic , author Dr. Robert Mendelsohn frames up modern medicine as a type of religion, complete with priests (read: doctors), sacraments, rituals, and even...