Skip to main content

Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health by Ivan Illich

This book was profoundly useful, giving me a set of extraordinarily helpful lenses to better understand both the modern medical/healthcare industry, but also to better understand modernity itself. Although this book is primarily about healthcare, it is also prescient in identifying many of the alienating and atomizing aspects of modern civilization. This book may have been written in the early 1970s, but the author was decades ahead of his time.

One of the foundational concepts of this book is iatrogenesis, which essentially means “harm done by the healer.” I was first exposed to this word thanks to Nassim Taleb in his book Antifragile. In Medical Nemesis, Ivan Illich begins with a discussion of medical iatrogenics in the most basic sense, but then expands the concept into far broader terms, discussing three genres of iatrogenesis: 1) clinical iatrogenesis, 2) social iatrogenesis, and 3) cultural iatrogenesis: 

1) Clinical iatrogenesis is the “plain vanilla form” of iatrogenesis: damage done to a patient by a doctor. It can be caused by doctor incompetence, by accident, by a doctor to protect his own legal liability (by ordering tests or procedures that may or may not be necessary to the patient but serve to cover the doctor's legal risk), or by unknown reasons. 

2) Social iatrogenesis is a form of damage done when the medical practice or our government encourages or reinforces society to become greater and greater over-consumers of healthcare. This can come from overscreening, overmedicating, from disease-mongering or from labeling people as sick who may not actually be. This includes “breeding” new categories of patients, who can then be encouraged to pay for meds or treatment to “fix” them. Also, we are subject to various grooming practices, even from childhood, to encourage us to tolerate various behaviors: doctors who “use a foreign language” (medical terminology) while they discuss our case right in front of us; doctors who may perform tests or perform actions (even pain-inducing actions) without explanation or apology, etc.

3) Cultural iatrogenesis is when the healthcare industry interferes with people's potential to deal on their own with human weakness and vulnerability. Examples might be: interfering in healthy responses to suffering and impairment. Or, undermining the individual’s ability to face their reality and accept inevitable decline and death. Think of it like a second-order iatrogenesis that sickens and weakens us culturally. 

The modern phrase “evidence-based healthcare”--widely used by healthcare evangelists and propagandists--should trigger alarm bells in the mind of any competent critical thinker. Once anyone has even the most basic familiarly with the great crisis of reproducibility, to say nothing of the various other problems suffusing all “studies show” science findings (p-hacking, file drawer effects, statistical gerrymandering, overdependence on Gaussian/normal curve statistical analysis, etc.), one cannot no longer hear the words “evidence-based healthcare” without a sense of bitter irony. 

In the modern era we are trained to use money as a solution for everything, including our health. Thus we pay for meds, doctor’s appointments, surgeries, insurance... while we demand more and more government support and funding for “healthcare.” All of this, circularly, simply contributes to the desire to buy our way out of all situations, including buying our way out of reality--and even out of death itself. And of course along the way we have become an enormously overmedicated society. 

I also wonder what this author would think--as he laments the upward explosion of healthcare spending from 4% of GDP in the 1960s to 8% in the 1970s--to know that today healthcare costs exceed 20% of GDP (!) as life expectancy and life quality are actually declining.

It is slowly becoming clear to me that iatrogenesis is a feature, not a bug, of modern healthcare--and possibly of modern society in general. It is endemic in many more ways than we realize. And once you can “see” iatrogenics, you can never unsee it.

More Posts

A Technique for Producing Ideas by James Webb Young

It's a rare pleasure to find so many insights in such a short book. A modern reader can't help but notice the stark contrast between A Technique for Producing Ideas  and most modern books, which might have a few paragraphs' worth of insights, but yet always seem to be fluffed and padded out to at least 200-300 pages. The author gives away a formula for creativity and idea generation that is simple, but not easy. And as a result almost no one will follow it. In the author's own one-paragraph summary, his process is: * First, the gathering of raw materials--both the materials of your immediate problem and the materials which come from a constant enrichment of your store of general knowledge.  * Second, the working over of these materials in your mind.  * Third, the incubating stage, where you let something beside the conscious mind do the work of synthesis.  * Fourth, the actual birth of the Idea--the 'Eureka! I have it!' stage. * And fifth, the final shaping and ...

The Genesis of Russophobia in Great Britain by John H. Gleason

In-depth (and surprisingly interesting!) analysis of the shifting public and government opinion on Russia during late 18th and early/mid 19th century England, plus a useful (and telling) exploration of the various propaganda and media narratives used to drive these opinions. I've written before on this site, many times, that history rhymes, it doesn't repeat exactly, so you have to know your history--and by this I mean know your actual history, not your country's preferred propaganda narrative of history--in order to see that rhyme to make useful, accurate predictions. It is fascinating to see England in the 1800s applying various forms of the same propagandized and manufactured Russophobia that we see in the United States today. England went from a literal  alliance with Russia (against Napoleonic France) to a state of paranoid loathing of Russia in a matter of decades; the USA likewise went from " aren't they our friends now? " after the Soviet collapse to...

The Design of Everyday Things by Don Norman

This looks like a book about foundational concepts of good design, but in reality it's a deep and intelligent book addressing a tremendous range of topics: psychology, cognition, on minding details, on being "meta" about rules and procedures, even how to navigate the modern world. One of the most valuable and interesting books I've read all year. Pair with  The Upper Half of the Motorcycle by Bernt Spiegel.  Notes:  [Warning: Long] 0) Norman's Law : the day the product team is announced, it is behind schedule and over its budget. Ch 1: The Psychopathology of Everyday Things 1) "Norman doors" confusing doors, or doors that don't work right. "The design of the door should indicate how to work it without any need for signs, certainly without any need for trial and error." 2) "Two of the most important characteristics of redesign are discoverability and understanding. * Discoverability : Is it possible to even figure out what actions are...