Skip to main content

Straight to Hell by John LeFevre

A strange book: think of the movie The Wolf of Wall Street, but instead of retail brokers on Long Island, it's the institutional bond syndicate desk at a major bank. But the pranks, the drugs and the ludicrous behavior are all the same. 

Straight to Hell is crass, outlandish, instructive at certain points[*] and genuinely comedic at others--but I wish I hadn't read it. It's hard to tell what the author is trying to do exactly (moralize? satirize? shock? warn?), but ultimately the book leaves you with a gross feeling: for the author, for all the people in the story, and for yourself as the reader.

For readers interested in this genre: stick to Michael Lewis' classic Liar's Poker. 

[*] Instructive, that is, if you're curious how an institutional sell-side bond house works; how bond issuance deals are won and lost; how major sell-side firms both compete and cooperate as they fight over deals; how these deals, once won, are then doled out to institutional investor clients. I can't imagine many readers would share this curiosity, however--and you have to fight through a lot of unsavory stories to satisfy it.

Notes: 
1) Now that I've read my fair share of works about Buddhism (see in particular Thich Nhat Hanh's The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching) I'd consider this book an example of "bad intellectual nutriments."

2) Early on you can tell this book is unlikely to interest somebody from outside the business.

3) The author starts at an intern, then does the company training program (note the ruthlessness the company uses to weed out underperformers), he survives his first few years, then moves up to join the fixed income syndicate desk, a big job.  

4) "Statistically speaking, you shouldn't worry about what your first wife's mother looks like." I had to think about this one for a while before I got it.

5) On winning the right to offer a deal on behalf of a bond issuer (getting the client "pregnant") and then "we'll moonwalk them back once we win the deal" to agree to more realistic deal terms (on interest rates for example, or deal size). Also you control the client by suggesting it would signal weakness or be embarrassing to cancel a deal after a long roadshow, the client might lose "access" to capital markets, etc.

6) The deal process--everything from bakeoff to roadshow to deal allocation--is all well explained, but will likely be over the head of most readers outside the industry.

7) The mechanics of a bond deal that goes badly: just the same as a bad IPO. When clients get a "full allocation" they instantly know the deal is bad.

8) Note also the game theory aspect of bond issuers who frequently need to access capital markets: See the Thai telecom company with debt maturities that need to be "rolled" in each of the next few years; we thus have a game theory situation with repeated iterations, so the parties involved can only screw each other over to a certain point! They know they have to play the game again soon. Equity deals are less like this. 

9) See also certain interesting agency problems here: say you work for a sell-side bond shop and your client (a company that wants to issue bonds) comes to you, thinking of doing a bond issue between October and December. Well, how does your P&L look? Is your bonus already set for this year? Then encourage the client to wait for January so that deal would show up in next year's bonus numbers--plus you start the year with a great-looking deal pipeline.

More Posts

Hot, Flat and Crowded by Thomas Friedman

I've now read three of Thomas Friedman's books, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, The World Is Flat, and now, Hot, Flat, and Crowded. And Hot Flat and Crowded is--by far--the weakest book of the three. In fact, a cynic might consider it more of a brand extension than a book--a recycling of The World is Flat to include well-meaning and repetitive chapters on energy policy, the environment and global warming. And despite his earnest and palliative writing tone, Friedman's political message has become shrill, and that shrillness debases many of the potentially intriguing ideas and arguments he makes throughout the book. According to Friedman, everything is the Americans' fault. We're supposed to be leaders of the free world, yet we should only act with the consensus blessing of all the rest of the world's countries. We invaded Iraq, which was wrong. We invaded Afghanistan, which was sort of right, but we're making far too many mistakes there. We don't educat...

How to Make Money in Any Market by Jim Cramer

Not Cramer's best, although there are insights here. I recommend instead two of Cramer's earlier works: Real Money: Sane Investing in an Insane World  and Getting Back to Even . The central idea in  How to Make Money in Any Market  is to structure your portfolio with roughly half of your assets in a low-fee S&P 500 index fund, and roughly the other half in five or so carefully researched "hero" stocks that are meant to be long-term secular growers and compounders over time. A remaining sliver of your portfolio should be in some sort of hedge: gold or Bitcoin [1] . Chapter 7 walks readers through this elegant portfolio structure. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] The books' weaknesses show u...

Solaris by Stanislaw Lem

Fascinating and challenging 1960s-era sci-fi about the incredible, even unimaginable, difficulties involved in first contact between civilizations. The planet Solaris features a strange, tissue-like surface that usually acts like a liquid, but can also spontaneously form all sorts of shapes and geological formations. It has been studied and debated over by generations of Earth scientists, many of whom believe the planet itself exhibits a form of intelligence, perhaps even consciousness and self-awareness.   Unlike TV sci-fi, where aliens always seem to be other actors wearing bumpy rubber foreheads who all somehow speak great English, this is "hard-science" sci-fi, and it traffics in the much more plausible notion that an alien species would have an intelligence so radically different from ours that we might never understand it. Author Stanislaw Lem tells the story in a nested and indirect fashion, reminding the reader a bit of Mary Shelley's  Frankenstein . The reader ...