Skip to main content

The Art of Growing Old: Aging with Grace by Marie de Hennezel

I'd recommend reading the last chapter, "Knowing How to Die" and the conclusion. The remainder of the book, while sincere, is undirected, repetitive and platitudinous. The book would benefit from a significant rewrite. 

Further, readers interested in handling the various physical and existential challenges of aging would be better served reading the Stoics (specifically Epictetus) as well as literature from the Taoist and Buddhist traditions.

Notes: 
* I wonder if this author is a better writer in her native French?

* The author, a clinical therapist, is plainly not qualified to talk about biological aspects of aging, nor dietary science. As just one example, the author regrettably recommends consuming canola/rapeseed oil--at a time when dietary science consensus began pivoting away from industrial seed oils.

* Characteristics of successful old people (this is my basic summary based on this book):
+ resilience and "conation" which means intentional effort, actively directed energy focused toward the accomplishment of tasks.
+ radiance, and also note the idea that one can actively choose to be radiant: that radiance "is the fruit of deliberate, clear-headed work."
+ adopting other specific psychological strategies for aging: being adaptable, accepting your limits with good humor, saying no/setting boundaries, setting up an appropriate daily routine, having many close relationships, learning to be optimistic.
+ don't be needy: the ideal is not expect too much of others but simply to be receptive, "behaving so that people enjoy listening to us, meeting us, and communicating with us." In other words: cultivate the trait of agreeability. 
+ do not complain, ever. 
+ cultivate an acceptance that all you have will be taken away, eventually. Consider deeply the fundamental transience of all things.
+ avoid cynicism or an attitude of "I've seen it all before"; rather, cultivate a sense/mindset of wonder, of admiration, of curiosity.  

* The book is often all over the place, is it about teaching caregivers how to get better care to the elderly? Is it about Alzheimer's? Is it about housing for the elderly, or housing for the elderly with Alzheimer's? I thought this is a book about aging gracefully, but much of it reads more like a policy book, with all sorts of optimistic examples of how to do eldercare better...

* Examples of the author's sincere yet often platitudinous writing:
"Acceptance of old age begins with coming to terms with it." 
"It is time to convince women to love their aging faces." 
The author also has a tendency to pull platitudinous quotes from other writers and then further wrap her own platitudes around them.  

* So, what is it, exactly, that makes a platitude a platitude? As a reader, you know it when you see it, but what precisely makes it so? Is it an insight-free truism rendered in words? One that triggers a "meh" response in the reader? Or a series of truism-type sentences that just don't go anywhere, rhetorically or logically? 

* "I knew l a depressive, unpleasant man of eighty who changed completely after spending time in an intensive care unit. ...He made the decision never to complain again and to thank heaven every day for the joy of life."

* The Coué method, NLP, 

* Sex late in life hinges enormously on the woman's attitude. Taoist approaches to sex.

* The body you "are" vs the body you "have"

* Knowing How to Die: this final chapter has much more merit than the others, it addresses questions/ethics surrounding suicide and euthanasia, it discusses the generosity of actually dying in the presence of others, and how that act can communicate important values and truths.

* On the author's own mother-in-law who stopped taking food.

To read:
Ram Das: Still Here: Embracing Aging, Changing, and Dying
Mitch Albom: Tuesdays with Morrie
Sister Emmanuelle: Vivre, à quoi ça sert?
Marie de Hennezel: Intimate Death
Rainer Maria Rilke: Duino Elegies
Robert Dilts: Changing Belief Systems with NLP
Jolan Chang: The Tao of Love and Sex
Simone de Beauvoir: The Coming of Age
Crin Blanc (1953 short film)
The Ballad of Narayama (1983 film)


More Posts

Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications by Irving J. Good

This collection of scientific papers is a challenging but useful discussion on statistical methods, probability, randomness, logic and decision-making. Much of the book centers around Bayesian statistical methods and when and why to use them, as well as "philosophy of science"-type discussions on when a scientist should--or sometimes must--apply subjective judgments to scientific problems. It will help enormously if you've had a semester or two of statistics to really get at the meat of this book. If not, scroll down a few paragraphs for a short list of layperson-friendly books that address many of these subjects more accessibly. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my work here: if you purchase your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, or from my sister site  Casual Kitchen , I will receive a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you!] Author Irving Good worked with Alan Turing at ...

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker

Tedious, weak, and worst of all  "riddled" with errors  and oversights. Do not read. I recommend instead  Dreaming: A Very Short Introduction  by J. Allan Hobson  for information about the REM/dreaming stage of sleep, as well as  Restful Sleep  by Deepak Chopra  for readers interested in practical help for improving sleep quality. Unlike Why We Sleep , both of these books are short, direct, readable and clear. Sadly, I also have to spend a brief few sentences  on Alexey Guzey's devastating criticisms of this book . Alexey's entire post is very much worth reading, but if you want to see just one glaring example of atrocious academic ethics, you can start with a chart Matthew Walker uses in Chapter 6 to prove a linear relationship between sleep loss and sports injury-- except that he cuts off the part of the chart that disproves his argument . This is childish middle school stuff, way beneath the line of a Berkeley and Harvard professor, a...

Ghost Boy by Martin Pistorius

Read this book and you'll never complain, ever, about anything. Imagine being trapped in a vegetative body but with full cognition and awareness. You can hear, see and understand everything, but you can't move or do anything. Everyone around you--your family, your caregivers, everyone--thinks you're a literal vegetable. And some of those around you will act like it, having insulting conversations about you while you're right there. Some caregivers--not all of them, mercifully--will handle you like a slab of meat. Occasionally you'll be rolled over to a performative "activity" in which a caregiver drags your fingerpainted hand across a paper, so your care facility can show your family you aren't spending all day staring at the wall. But yet you do spend most of your time staring at the wall, or worse, watching Barney . You will come to hate Barney with all your soul. Imagine living like this. For years . Until one caregiver really looks at you, really...