Skip to main content

Northwest Passage by Kenneth Roberts

Recommended only to readers deeply interested in the French and Indian War. Otherwise an interesting and competent historical fiction best-seller from 1937, which in its day was the second best-selling book behind Gone With the Wind, which came out just the year before. See also the 1940 film with Spencer Tracy starring as Major Rogers, a near-godlike leader of men in the North American bush, but a deeply flawed and narcissistically grandiose failure everywhere else in his life.

Note/quotes:
* "Never tell people what you really think, if it's at all different from what they think, because it sets 'em against you on general principles."

* "He ain't educated at all! He don't even know why Indians cry when they're drunk!" McNott mocking the ivory tower educated Langdon Towne. 

* Interesting (or depressing) to see Wikipedia criticize the author for insufficient wokeism: alleging anti-semitism, not anti-racist enough, etc. Depending on your taste you can use this as a substantial cue for whether you should or should not read this book.

* Note also that by "retrospective bigoteering"--criticizing a prior generation for failing to meet today's (assumed) more enlightened standards--is really an error of solipsism: unless society is perfected already (which, uh, clearly it is not) then future eras will look back on us and find us guilty of these same bigotries by their standards.

* The first half of the book is well-paced: the infamous raid on the village of St. Francis is quite well told and really moves the reader along. And then the escape, the ambush, getting back with almost no food, the astounding leadership of M Rogers to get the men home; it all makes for good reading. 

* Being blind to flaws of those who we see as our heroes: narrator Langdon Towne sees the first clues that Major Rogers isn't as perfect as Towne wants wants him to be. "This was a dreadful creature... and yet my admiration for him still lived." Towne struggles to disabuse himself of his first impression of him as a hero.

* The second half of the novel (the London period) is written in a notably different style, kind of a rip-off of Dickens; it doesn't work as well as the first half of the book. Random plot twists, Towne "receives" a daughter via the irresponsibility of one of the characters, and there's no underlying hero's journey that compares to the high drama of the first half of the book. The story is a bit adrift here and not as compelling.

More Posts

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator by Edwin Lefevre [fictionalized bio of Jesse Livermore]

"History repeats itself all the time in Wall Street." A fictionalized biography of Jesse Livermore, one of history's most famous speculators. This is an enriching book, worth reading every decade or so across your investment career. And it's a genuinely fun read, conveying the free-wheeling investment culture of the days before the Securities and Exchange Act. When you're young and beginning to invest, this book thrills you with all the bravado of speculating. When you're older, after you've seen a few things and learned many of the manipulations and other techniques the investment industry uses to extract money from you, the book becomes more of a cautionary tale of things not to do, traps not to step in, things to avoid. This is the third time I've read this book (I'm now in my fourth decade as an investor, so I guess that makes me one reading behind schedule), and what struck me most this time around was Livermore's self-admitted weaknesses:...

The Retirement Myth by Craig S. Karpel

A 1995-era book for Boomers by a pre-Boomer (the author is technically a tail-end Silent, but he writes and thinks like a Boomer) who is dismayed at the Boomers' complete unpreparedness as they Boom their way towards an imaginary retirement in a system the author thinks is about to collapse.  Let's get the bottom line out of the way. This is a bad and boring book with incontinent logic.  Then why read it? You  don't have to, and shouldn't. But I often review bad books as an intellectual exercise: to think about what is wrong with a book, what should and should not have been done in writing it, where the errors (of, say, conception, of structure, of logic, of rhetoric) are, and so on. And with books that make predictions, it's a glorious opportunity to practice epistemic humility to read that book after its predictions should have (but didn't) come true. Finally, you can mine even the worst books for useful insights--or in this case contra-insights, since the in...

Confessions of a Medical Heretic by Robert S. Mendelsohn, MD

"I have written this book precisely to scare and to radicalize people before they are hurt. Let this book be your radicalizing experience." The more I come into contact with modern medicine, the more I've watched my elders' lives intersect with it, the more I've observed the field's neomania and accompanying iatrogenic harms, the more I realize that everyone--everyone!--should read the following four books: H. Gilbert Welch: Less Medicine, More Health Ivan Illich: Medical Nemesis Dr. John Sarno: The Divided Mind Robert S. Mendelsohn: Confessions of a Medical Heretic While reading these works, it will be worth noting your internal reaction to them. Do you agree? Do you strongly reject? Why? And what might this indicate about your attachment to your existing beliefs about medicine? In Confession of a Medical Heretic , author Dr. Robert Mendelsohn frames up modern medicine as a type of religion, complete with priests (read: doctors), sacraments, rituals, and even...