Skip to main content

Valis by Philip K. Dick

A deep and crazy book that makes the reader wonder about religion and about the nature of reality. Along the way you will wonder about the author's sanity and maybe even your own. 

I read Philip K. Dick's book Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said many years ago and was tripped out by it: you get to the end and you realize that the entire reality of the book was a construct, a type of Matrix that was never real in the first place. The movies Total Recall (based on his short story We Can Remember It For You Wholesale) and Blade Runner (based on his novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?) also toy with what experienced reality means: if you implant perfectly believable memories into someone, is that "reality" to them? How would they know otherwise?

Valis goes even deeper, reaching into domains of psychological sanity, philosophy, religion and creation, and the reader is often wondering "Is this deep? Or is it just crazy?" I think this is part of the pleasure of reading PKD.

Dick was likely on the spectrum of insanity at different points of his life, and in Valis he puts himself in the book as two split personalities of the same person: one character named "Phil" and the other character named "Horselover Fat." They are the same person but not quite: Horselover Fat is an alter ego that "split off" during certain periods of extreme psychological stress. The two characters talk to each other, observe each other, even bitch and complain to each other. I thought of it as an interesting meta-commentary on the nature of sanity: if you can write sanely about your own insanity--does that make you sane or insane?

PKD isn't a great writer, but no one reads him for his writing. You read him to be challenged with all the fascinating ways he plays with psychological reality. 

Dick aficionados[*] also read him for the warped eclecticisms of his mind: Valis teaches a reader, quite comprehensively by the way, about Gnosticism (a generous gift in and of itself). You'll read about the fragments of Xenophones, about Giordano Bruno and Meister Echkart. You'll read about novel ways to think about religion and why it has more explanatory value than it may appear to moderns besotted with the modern era's "scientific progress." 

And yet (and this is the intrinsic pessimism of PKD's works that some readers love and some readers hate) you realize that there's not a lot you can do about the system. "To fight the Empire is to be infected by its derangement. This is a paradox; whoever defeats a segment of the Empire becomes the Empire; it proliferates like a virus, imposing its form on its enemies. Thereby it becomes its enemies." In a way this quote encapsulates the paradox of modern politics, of modern government systems, of modernity in general: it runs us, we don't run it. Quite an interesting quote.

Finally, holy cow on the vocab in this book, it sent me sprinting to the dictionary more than any book I've read in years: 

Hylozoism: the idea that all matter is alive
Hypostasis: the underlying reality or the underlying essence of something
Entelechy: the realization of potential; that which takes something's potential and makes it actual
Abreaction: the expression and consequent release of a previously repressed emotion, achieved through reliving the experience that caused it
Irruption: to burst in, contrasted from "eruption" which is to burst out
Kerygma: a proclamation, usually religious
Anamnesis: the loss of forgetfulness (in the Jungian sense of recalling formerly lost knowledge of your forebears or of your species, etc.)



Reading list:
Theodor Reik: Listening with the Third Ear  
Mircea Eliade: A History of Religious Ideas [3 volumes]
Tobias Churton: The Gnostics
Giovanni Filoramo: A History of Gnosticism
Thomas Disch (science fiction author)
The works of Meister Eckhart (German Christian mystic)

[*] Yes, yes, I wrote that on purpose. 

More Posts

Capital Returns: Investing Through the Capital Cycle: A Money Manager’s Reports 2002-15 [Edward Chancellor, Editor]

A collection of essays, culled from Marathon Asset Management's letters to clients, unified into what turns out to be an uneven book: useful in places, nearly useless in others. However, it offers readers good insights on how to think long term about investing in stocks, and the "capital cycle" (which I'll explain in the next paragraph) is an extraordinarily useful paradigm for investors. So what is the "capital cycle," and how do you invest "through" it? Essentially, all companies have capacity decisions to make, all the time. They have to expand capacity to meet market demand (or contract if there's a decline in demand), and they also have to game theory out what their competitors are thinking about their capacity. Every industry has its own dynamics, of course, but when an industry is in oversupply (in other words it has too much capacity), business quickly becomes terrible, earnings drop, and stock prices go down. And when the reverse is t...

Athanasius: the Life of Antony (Vita Antonii) and the Letter to Marcellinus

The first few centuries of Christianity offer an opportunity to learn about another period of great upheaval, an era when political, philosophical--and in this particular case, religious doctrinal differences--pulled society apart. As always, the past gives us guidance for navigating the upheaval of today. Athanasius' biography (actually hagiography) of Antony is on one level an extended Holy Desert Fathers reading. Antony was a desert OG, and there are wonderful discussions here on the beautiful early Christian ideals of prudence, justice, hospitality, temperance, courage, asceticism, on concern for the poor, on developing freedom from anger. In today's increasingly irreligious era, as the State becomes our "deity," these ideals are in steady decline. On another level, this work is also a piece of propaganda, using the life of a saint to make a doctrinal argument. Athanasius uses Antony as a mouthpiece to defend the Nicene doctrine of the Trinity, and attack the het...

The Day of the Barbarians by Alessandro Barbero

Excellent, readable short history of the battle of Adrianople, setting it in context of the final decades of the Western Roman Empire. Worth reading in particular for valuable historical context for the various fiscal, monetary and immigration policies the USA has embraced over the past few generations. At a certain point in Rome's historical arc, its leaders discovered that it could use barbarians as low cost labor and low cost military manpower. Further, both immigration and a type of what we might call "loose fiscal policy" could be powerful tools Roman elites could use to retain power and maintain the status quo that so enriched them at the expense of the peasantry. As the saying goes, history never repeats, but it sure rhymes. And it is incredibly disturbing to see policy decisions in 300-400 AD Rome--right before its collapse--that "rhyme" so well with various fiscal, monetary and immigration policies in place here and now in the USA. Striking.  Finally, o...