Skip to main content

The Shadow of Kilimanjaro by Rick Ridgeway

An environmental travelogue of a walk, on foot, across Kenya, from the top of Mount Kilimanjaro all the way to the Indian Ocean. You'll learn about the various debates surrounding efforts to conserve habitat and wildlife in Africa, you'll learn a lot about elephants and the people who used to hunt them, and you'll be perhaps disturbed by the arrogance of non-local "experts" meddling with (and often catastrophically disrupting) entire cultures, all in the name of "conservation."

You'll also, at times, suffer from author Rick Ridgeway's leaden pen. His style would improve significantly if he would do three simple things:

1) Put down the thesaurus and stay within the constraints of his working vocabulary,
2) Stop using compound verbs (e.g.: have done, has said, had known), and
3) Omit needless words

There's also something creepy and bothersome about a white environmentalist/travel writer walking unburdened through the African bush with guides and armed guards, while hired local porters drive ahead, prepare a camp, carry and set up all their shit for them, make gourmet dinners for them, etc., while the author talks about various "hardships" he experiences. It's discordant and tone-deaf.

Notes: 
* The anti poaching efforts with the Waliangulu tribe look to a modern reader like aggressive prosecutorial excess: preying on the sincere naivete of one tribe member to capture others, and ultimately achieving the (most likely unnecessary) destruction of their way of life.

* Note how the governments in Africa--particularly white-led governments--decided the fate of entire cultures by (among other examples) outlawing elephant hunting by the Waliangulu, a tribe with a centuries- or possibly millennia-long tradition of sustainable hunting. 

* There is a conundrum in imposing conservation standards on cultures that are not ready for those standards--kind of like imposing democracy on unready cultures. Or, is it wrong--even condescending--to assume, with certainty, that developing countries will exterminate their megafauna, and thus "need" standards imposed on them? But can you then afford to risk waiting until the megafauna are all gone? Do you trust that the various peoples there figure it out themselves before that happens? Or do you externally impose conservation discipline anyway, which may involve taking away tremendous regions of land, resettling people, and disrupting many cultures?  

* Orthodox environmentalists seem to struggle with the idea that hunters love the planet too, that hunters might actually be interested in conservation as well. This author is orthodox in his thinking, and that he expels a lot of ink struggling with resolving these ideas. Just resolve them! Sometimes people you don't expect to be on your team are on your team. Take them onto your team. It's like compulsively using a democrat/republican paradigm to navigate reality--it doesn't work anymore.

* A dead, dead giveaway for a windy, masturbatory writer is the use of the expression "warp and woof." Even worse is the red-headed stepchild "warp and weft" which the author uses twice in ten pages near the end of the book. Do not use these phrases.

Reading list:
The Hunting Peoples by Carlton S. Coon
Coming of Age with Elephants by Joyce Poole
Ivory Crisis by Ian Parker
The Lunatic Express by Charles Miller
The End of the Game by Peter Beard
Out of Africa by Isaac Dinesen/Karen Blixen
The Periplus of the Erythrean Sea (10th Century Byzantine manuscript)
The Myth of Wild Africa by Jonathan Adams and Thomas McShane

More Posts

The Genealogy of Morals by Friedrich Nietzsche (trans. Francis Golffing)

Of the three essays of The Genealogy of Morals  I recommend the first two. Skim the third. Collectively, they are extremely useful reading for citizens of the West to see clearly the oligarchic power dynamics under which we live. Show me a modern Western nation-state where there isn't an increasing concentration of power among the elites--and a reduction in freedom for everyone else. You can't find one. Today we live in an increasingly neo-feudal system, where elites control more and more of the wealth, the actions, even the  thoughts  of the masses. Perhaps we should see the rare flowerings of genuine democratic freedom (6th century BC Athens, Republic-era Rome, and possibly pre-1913 USA ) for what they really are: extreme outliers, quickly replaced with tyranny. The first essay inverts the entire debate about morality, as Nietzsche nukes centuries of philosophical ethics by simply saying the powerful simply do what they do , and thus those things are good by defi...

The Fourth Turning is Here by Neil Howe

If you've read the original  The Fourth Turning , much of this book will be review. However, this book explains the Forth Turning framework more cogently and tightly than the original, so if you  haven't  read the original book, I recommend just reading this and skipping the original. You'll walk away with the same central ideas plus the author's additional new (and slightly-adjusted) conclusions. The most profound takeaway from the overall Fourth Turning paradigm is that it teaches you to remember your place in the grand scheme of things. Sadly, modernity teaches the exact opposite: it persuades us to think we humans are bigger than history, that we can ignore it, be oblivious to it, and yet not repeat it. Worst of all, modernity teaches us to believe we've somehow managed to defeat history with our SOYANCE!!! and tEcHNologY--ironically none of which we can understand, replicate or repair. These "modren" beliefs, as arrogant and wrong as they are, conflic...

Anatomy of the State by Murray Rothbard

Tight, concise discussion of what the State really is and what it really does, not what we would like it to be. Thanks to the recent pandemic response, most of us lost once and for all our delusive belief that governments are a force for good, a force for fairness and justice. In this short book, Murray Rothbard shows how the State--no matter how "limited" a government you might set up in the beginning--always, always abrogates its citizens' rights and freedoms. It's just a matter of time. We also come to understand why the State loves war. It loves it. It gives the State far more power. It provides an easy justification to abrogate still more freedoms. And of course those in the State apparatus who profit politically or economically from war never seem to send their own sons to fight it. An all-too-typical example: note how Benjamin Netanyahu's military-age son lives safely and luxuriously in Miami, his security paid for by Israeli taxpayers . The fourth chap...