Skip to main content

The Shadow of Kilimanjaro by Rick Ridgeway

An environmental travelogue of a walk, on foot, across Kenya, from the top of Mount Kilimanjaro all the way to the Indian Ocean. You'll learn about the various debates surrounding efforts to conserve habitat and wildlife in Africa, you'll learn a lot about elephants and the people who used to hunt them, and you'll be perhaps disturbed by the arrogance of non-local "experts" meddling with (and often catastrophically disrupting) entire cultures, all in the name of "conservation."

You'll also, at times, suffer from author Rick Ridgeway's leaden pen. His style would improve significantly if he would do three simple things:

1) Put down the thesaurus and stay within the constraints of his working vocabulary,
2) Stop using compound verbs (e.g.: have done, has said, had known), and
3) Omit needless words

There's also something creepy and bothersome about a white environmentalist/travel writer walking unburdened through the African bush with guides and armed guards, while hired local porters drive ahead, prepare a camp, carry and set up all their shit for them, make gourmet dinners for them, etc., while the author talks about various "hardships" he experiences. It's discordant and tone-deaf.

Notes: 
* The anti poaching efforts with the Waliangulu tribe look to a modern reader like aggressive prosecutorial excess: preying on the sincere naivete of one tribe member to capture others, and ultimately achieving the (most likely unnecessary) destruction of their way of life.

* Note how the governments in Africa--particularly white-led governments--decided the fate of entire cultures by (among other examples) outlawing elephant hunting by the Waliangulu, a tribe with a centuries- or possibly millennia-long tradition of sustainable hunting. 

* There is a conundrum in imposing conservation standards on cultures that are not ready for those standards--kind of like imposing democracy on unready cultures. Or, is it wrong--even condescending--to assume, with certainty, that developing countries will exterminate their megafauna, and thus "need" standards imposed on them? But can you then afford to risk waiting until the megafauna are all gone? Do you trust that the various peoples there figure it out themselves before that happens? Or do you externally impose conservation discipline anyway, which may involve taking away tremendous regions of land, resettling people, and disrupting many cultures?  

* Orthodox environmentalists seem to struggle with the idea that hunters love the planet too, that hunters might actually be interested in conservation as well. This author is orthodox in his thinking, and that he expels a lot of ink struggling with resolving these ideas. Just resolve them! Sometimes people you don't expect to be on your team are on your team. Take them onto your team. It's like compulsively using a democrat/republican paradigm to navigate reality--it doesn't work anymore.

* A dead, dead giveaway for a windy, masturbatory writer is the use of the expression "warp and woof." Even worse is the red-headed stepchild "warp and weft" which the author uses twice in ten pages near the end of the book. Do not use these phrases.

Reading list:
The Hunting Peoples by Carlton S. Coon
Coming of Age with Elephants by Joyce Poole
Ivory Crisis by Ian Parker
The Lunatic Express by Charles Miller
The End of the Game by Peter Beard
Out of Africa by Isaac Dinesen/Karen Blixen
The Periplus of the Erythrean Sea (10th Century Byzantine manuscript)
The Myth of Wild Africa by Jonathan Adams and Thomas McShane

More Posts

Hot, Flat and Crowded by Thomas Friedman

I've now read three of Thomas Friedman's books, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, The World Is Flat, and now, Hot, Flat, and Crowded. And Hot Flat and Crowded is--by far--the weakest book of the three. In fact, a cynic might consider it more of a brand extension than a book--a recycling of The World is Flat to include well-meaning and repetitive chapters on energy policy, the environment and global warming. And despite his earnest and palliative writing tone, Friedman's political message has become shrill, and that shrillness debases many of the potentially intriguing ideas and arguments he makes throughout the book. According to Friedman, everything is the Americans' fault. We're supposed to be leaders of the free world, yet we should only act with the consensus blessing of all the rest of the world's countries. We invaded Iraq, which was wrong. We invaded Afghanistan, which was sort of right, but we're making far too many mistakes there. We don't educat...

A Simple Rule for Getting Rid of Your Excess Books

If you read a lot of books like we do, perhaps you share our problem: Our home is gradually getting overrun by books. Piles of them. Sure, we've made resolutions to control the spread of our collection, like "no more buying books!" and "only get books out of the library!" We've tried these approaches, but unfortunately, not only do rules like these suck the fun out of life, they're also ineffective. The thing is, even though we do get most of our books out of the library, and we don't really make a practice of buying books, we somehow still seem to have more books than we know what to do with. And the piles seem to grow, slowly but surely, with every month and year. Earlier this year, however, we adopted a simple strategy to control our book creep, and it has worked so well for us that I decided to share it with you in this blog: For every new book you bring into your home, you must immediately remove two. It doesn't matter whether you donate th...

The Two Income Trap by Elizabeth Warren

What is wrong with the following statement? "But the two-income family didn't just lose its safety net. By sending both adults into the labor force, these families actually increased the chances that they would need that safety net. In fact, they doubled the risk. With two adults in the workforce, the dual-income family has double the odds that someone could get laid off, downsized, or other wise left without a paycheck. Mom or Dad could suddenly lose a job." You've just read the fundamental thesis of The Two-Income Trap. If you agree with it--although I truly hope you're a better critical thinker than that--you'll have your views reinforced. Thus reading this book would be an unadulterated waste of your time. If on the other hand you are capable of critical thinking and you can successfully see through hilariously unrigorous "logic" of the above statement, then this book will still be a waste of your time (unless you like reading books for the s...