Skip to main content

Sri Sarada Devi, the Holy Mother: Her Teachings and Conversations

Sri Sarada Devi was the wife of the 19th century Hindu mystic Sri Ramakrishna. This book contains a short, informal biography of her along with records of her thoughts and conversations as told by followers and disciples. 

I know nothing, absolutely nothing, about Hinduism nor do I know anything of the famous Hindu mystics like Ramakrishna, but what's striking to me are the significant parallels with the mysticism of my own Christian tradition. You'll see the same paradoxes and questions discussed in this book also grappled with in The Sayings of the Holy Desert Fathers, or the works of Elder Porphyrios, St. Francis or St. Theresa of Avila. Questions on how to balance spiritual life with worldly responsibilities like earning a living, how to live a life of quiet virtue and asceticism, to what extent one should practice devotions or austerities like fasting in daily life, how to escape the various (and sometimes nested) traps of attachment, and so on.

Notes/Quotes:
* Sri Sarada Devi lived as an average Hindu woman; inwardly "she practiced total nonattachment and remained undisturbed by what happened in the physical world." "She regarded renunciation as the foundation of spiritual life." She did not seek disciples. Almost nothing was written about her, and few even knew of her existence.

* On antimarketing: In investing, you should never invest in any investment product sold to you. I wonder if the same holds true to in spiritual or moral domains: should you avoid spirituality that's "sold" to you? 

* She takes on/absorbs peoples' sins.

* "The less you become attached to the world, the more you enjoy peace of mind."

* "One must do some work. Through work alone can one remove the bondage of work, not by avoiding work. Total detachment comes later on. One should not be without work even for a moment."

* The four ages of Hindu mythology: Krita, Treta, Dvapara and Kali. "Their order of succession is according to the degree of degeneration of spirituality and righteousness in them. The present age is Kali, the most degenerate, and owing to the general lowering of standards in it, even a little spiritual practice is supposed to lead to great results." [emphasis mine: it's interesting to think about this paradox.]

* "What is there in money, my child? Sri Ramakrishna could not touch it. His hand would recoil before money. He said, 'This world is illusory. Had I known it to be otherwise, I would have covered your Kamarpukur [a village in West Bengal state] with leaves of gold. But I know the world to be impermanent. God alone is real.'"

* "However spiritual a man may be, he must pay the tax for the use of the body to the last farthing. But the difference between a great soul and an ordinary man is this: the latter weeps while leaving this body, whereas the former laughs. Death seems to him a mere play." [Read: we must all undergo suffering and death incidental to the embodied state.]

* "Everything--husband, wife, or even the body--is only illusory. These are all shackles of illusion. Unless you can free yourself from these bondages, you will never be able to go to the other shore of the world. Even this attachment to the body, the identification of the self with the body, must go. What is this body, my darling? It is nothing but three pounds of ashes when it is cremated. Why so much vanity about it? However strong or beautiful this body may be, its culmination is in those three pounds of ashes. And still people are so attached to it. Glory be to God!"

* Interesting paradox of the monastic life giving rise to its own form of vanity, its own (nested) form of attachment. It could be that "inner renunciation" could be superior, in other words rejecting the cloth of the monk (and thus the status of a monk), and thereby carry no outward sign of superiority or higher morality. Interesting parallel here with both Christianity and Taoism (e.g.: The man who lives in union with the true Tao possesses an interior light, which he carefully hides from view, thereby giving the appearance of a fool; an ordinary Tao would bring him the renown that the true Tao does not bring him.

* This book yields an interesting introduction to Hindu thinking, it's also very interesting to see many parallels with Western and Eastern beliefs, all major religions grapple with the same paradoxes: what should I do while I live, how shall I comport myself? What happens when I die? Do I live "in" the world or do I reject this world? How do I not suffer from the illusions of day-to-day life, and what is the underlying reality?

* Three categories of karma, the result of past actions: parabdha, agami and sanchita: "parabdha is like an arrow that has left the bow; it must strike the target. Agami is like an arrow that is attached to the bowstring, it is ready to be released but can be withheld. And sanchita is like the arrows in the quiver; it is held in reserve."

* "In one word, one should desire of God desirelessness. For desire alone is at the root of all suffering. It is the cause of repeated births and deaths. It is the obstacle in the way of liberation."

To read:
The Mahabharata (Hindu epic)
Sri Ramakrishna, The Great Master by Swami Saradananda
The Vedanta Way to Peace and Happiness by Adiswarananda

More Posts

The Late George Apley by John P. Marquand

This book at first strikes a reader like the humor writing of Mark Twain: nowhere near as funny as it sounds. But gradually it becomes clear that this is a subtle, nuanced satire that does something extremely difficult: it satirizes an elite social class without being cruel, it somehow satirizes with affection and sympathy. The Late George Apley is a pseudo-biography of a person who never existed, but who represents a typical member of the Boston aristocracy during a crucial period: when that aristocracy lost its near-total control of Boston's social and political environment at the onset of modernity. We get a tour of Boston Brahmin culture from before the Civil War right up to the 1930s (this was the "current day" for this 1936 novel), and we see how this culture, clannish, exclusive and powerful for generations, passed into obscurity as Boston became overwhelmed with mass immigration, as government became increasingly corrupt and bureaucratic, and as the city grew int

The Genealogy of Morals by Friedrich Nietzsche (trans. Francis Golffing)

Of the three essays of The Genealogy of Morals  I recommend the first two. Skim the third. Collectively, they are extremely useful reading for citizens of the West to see clearly the oligarchic power dynamics under which we live. Show me a modern Western nation-state where there isn't an increasing concentration of power among the elites--and a reduction in freedom for everyone else. You can't find one. Today we live in an increasingly neo-feudal system, where elites control more and more of the wealth, the actions, even the  thoughts  of the masses. Perhaps we should see the rare flowerings of genuine democratic freedom (6th century BC Athens, Republic-era Rome, and possibly pre-1913 USA ) for what they really are: extreme outliers, quickly replaced with tyranny. The first essay inverts the entire debate about morality, as Nietzsche nukes centuries of philosophical ethics by simply saying the powerful simply do what they do , and thus those things are good by definition. La

Merchants of Grain by Dan Norman

[Recommended for investing geeks and students of power structures. Everyone else can take a pass.] Certain industries or companies need to be "visible" and in the public eye. See, for example, story stocks like Nvidia, or branded consumer products companies (which require name recognition and habit formation in order to sell product), or any company run by a celebrity CEO. Think of this as one level of visibility. Note also: any publicly traded company--even if it has a name or a CEO nobody's ever heard of--must file financial reports and other filings. To have access to public equity markets and have your stock trade on an exchange, your company has to "come in and register" (to borrow the phrase from incompetent SEC Commissioner Gary Gensler), and this means putting a lot of information about your business out in the open. Now anybody can look at your filings, see your profitability metrics, see who your managers and directors and large shareholders are, and s