Skip to main content

The Pursuit of Power by William H. McNeill

Broad and interesting survey of the use of military advancements and technology as a power vector across history. Starts with the bronze age and trade-based advancements in both weaponry and metallurgy, and runs all the way to the 20th Century's full industrialization of war under centralized command and control.

The bronze age (circa 3500 BC) was history's first verified instance where trade was performed over great distances because tin and copper deposits were never near each other except in rare cases.

Also interesting to see the (albeit frequently forgotten) civilizational discovery that instead of extracting a one-time benefit from plundering conquered lands, you can get long-term, sustainable annuity benefits by exacting annual tributes. This produces a lot more value--and a lot less suffering--for both victor and vanquished.

Note the spontaneous ordering of a merchant class to invent and produce iron/steel (and as a result arms) in China, and how this discovery, along with China's staggering global lead in seagoing skill, naval power, regional control and mercantile power, how all of these world dominating capabilities came and then suddenly faded away in China, weirdly. The Chinese empire developed amazing technologies and capabilities, only to let them rot and die away as China retrenched and retreated from the global scene.

Of course these capabilities (including iron, steel, paper, gunpowder, even the establishment of a merchant class) were to be picked up centuries later in Western/Central Europe and used as vectors for dominating the rest of the world. 

Proto-industrialization of war began in the mid-19th century, beginning with the Crimean war in the 1850s, and then accelerating through the American civil war in the 1860s, and various Prussian/European conflicts to follow. Of course the world wars of the 20th century became the apotheosis of industrialized war under centralized command.

More Posts

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator by Edwin Lefevre [fictionalized bio of Jesse Livermore]

"History repeats itself all the time in Wall Street." A fictionalized biography of Jesse Livermore, one of history's most famous speculators. This is an enriching book, worth reading every decade or so across your investment career. And it's a genuinely fun read, conveying the free-wheeling investment culture of the days before the Securities and Exchange Act. When you're young and beginning to invest, this book thrills you with all the bravado of speculating. When you're older, after you've seen a few things and learned many of the manipulations and other techniques the investment industry uses to extract money from you, the book becomes more of a cautionary tale of things not to do, traps not to step in, things to avoid. This is the third time I've read this book (I'm now in my fourth decade as an investor, so I guess that makes me one reading behind schedule), and what struck me most this time around was Livermore's self-admitted weaknesses:...
Read more

The Retirement Myth by Craig S. Karpel

A 1995-era book for Boomers by a pre-Boomer (the author is technically a tail-end Silent, but he writes and thinks like a Boomer) who is dismayed at the Boomers' complete unpreparedness as they Boom their way towards an imaginary retirement in a system the author thinks is about to collapse.  Let's get the bottom line out of the way. This is a bad and boring book with incontinent logic.  Then why read it? You  don't have to, and shouldn't. But I often review bad books as an intellectual exercise: to think about what is wrong with a book, what should and should not have been done in writing it, where the errors (of, say, conception, of structure, of logic, of rhetoric) are, and so on. And with books that make predictions, it's a glorious opportunity to practice epistemic humility to read that book after its predictions should have (but didn't) come true. Finally, you can mine even the worst books for useful insights--or in this case contra-insights, since the in...
Read more

Confessions of a Medical Heretic by Robert S. Mendelsohn, MD

"I have written this book precisely to scare and to radicalize people before they are hurt. Let this book be your radicalizing experience." The more I come into contact with modern medicine, the more I've watched my elders' lives intersect with it, the more I've observed the field's neomania and accompanying iatrogenic harms, the more I realize that everyone--everyone!--should read the following four books: H. Gilbert Welch: Less Medicine, More Health Ivan Illich: Medical Nemesis Dr. John Sarno: The Divided Mind Robert S. Mendelsohn: Confessions of a Medical Heretic While reading these works, it will be worth noting your internal reaction to them. Do you agree? Do you strongly reject? Why? And what might this indicate about your attachment to your existing beliefs about medicine? In Confession of a Medical Heretic , author Dr. Robert Mendelsohn frames up modern medicine as a type of religion, complete with priests (read: doctors), sacraments, rituals, and even...
Read more