Skip to main content

The Pursuit of Power by William H. McNeill

Broad and interesting survey of the use of military advancements and technology as a power vector across history. Starts with the bronze age and trade-based advancements in both weaponry and metallurgy, and runs all the way to the 20th Century's full industrialization of war under centralized command and control.

The bronze age (circa 3500 BC) was history's first verified instance where trade was performed over great distances because tin and copper deposits were never near each other except in rare cases.

Also interesting to see the (albeit frequently forgotten) civilizational discovery that instead of extracting a one-time benefit from plundering conquered lands, you can get long-term, sustainable annuity benefits by exacting annual tributes. This produces a lot more value--and a lot less suffering--for both victor and vanquished.

Note the spontaneous ordering of a merchant class to invent and produce iron/steel (and as a result arms) in China, and how this discovery, along with China's staggering global lead in seagoing skill, naval power, regional control and mercantile power, how all of these world dominating capabilities came and then suddenly faded away in China, weirdly. The Chinese empire developed amazing technologies and capabilities, only to let them rot and die away as China retrenched and retreated from the global scene.

Of course these capabilities (including iron, steel, paper, gunpowder, even the establishment of a merchant class) were to be picked up centuries later in Western/Central Europe and used as vectors for dominating the rest of the world. 

Proto-industrialization of war began in the mid-19th century, beginning with the Crimean war in the 1850s, and then accelerating through the American civil war in the 1860s, and various Prussian/European conflicts to follow. Of course the world wars of the 20th century became the apotheosis of industrialized war under centralized command.

More Posts

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain

Huckleberry Finn is really two books: a good one and a bad one. The good one, the first fifteen or sixteen chapters, is engaging, original and beautiful. The second book, the bad one, is hackneyed, inorganic, farcical, and in places nearly unreadable.  It feels like the overall work was written by two different people, which in fact it more or less was: the Mark Twain of 1876, fresh off the tremendous success of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, and the Mark Twain of seven years later, cramped with financial stress and writer's block. Thus the back two-thirds of the book feels more like a collection of vaguely related short stories than a coherent novel, with random characters entering and exiting the stage to resuscitate an increasingly cadaverous plot. Twain is even forced to wedge Tom Sawyer back into the story late in the book, thanks to one of American literature's least plausible coincidences. It brings to mind Virginia Woolf's famously condescending remark about the no...
Read more

The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain

Fun, engaging novel about a very intelligent--and very naughty--boy. If we're lucky, we will all have a little bit of Tom Sawyer in us: we all misbehave, we all show off, we all counted the interminable minutes until recess, and we all have our little schemes and connivances. Nobody remembers the boys who behave themselves all the time. There's some subtlety to Twain's writing too at times: we see a good example in Chapter 6, when Tom is late to school. [1] You have to read with fairly close attention to note that Tom sees an empty seat, the only empty seat, next to Becky Thatcher on the girls' side of the classroom. He was thinking several steps ahead, and this was exactly why he spontaneously admits to his teacher, loudly, that his tardiness was due to talking to the town's black sheep, Huck Finn. He did it because he knew the teacher would put him on the girls' side of the schoolroom, right next to Becky! [A quick affiliate link to Amazon for those readers...
Read more

Understanding Human Nature by Alfred Adler

A difficult book, in part because Adler isn't all that good at expressing his ideas: he's a practitioner, not a writer, and it shows. Further, I believe Understanding Human Nature has more in direct value than direct value: the reader has to move from what the book teaches to a layer of second-order insights. I'll explain what I mean in a moment. First a quick summary of the book's core themes and ideas. According to Adler, we all have a psyche, formed and largely fixed in childhood, and that psyche has an ulterior psychological goal. For most of us, unfortunately, that goal takes the form of striving for power, control, attention, or superiority. Throughout the book Adler gives examples where peoples' psyche-driven strivings cause suffering, both for themselves as well as everyone else in their blast radius. Most of us will likely resist Adler's claim that to understand other people and their motivations you must first understand their psyches' "ulter...
Read more