Skip to main content

The Bitcoin Standard by Saifedean Ammous

 An uneven and at times repetitive book, but yet a book that absolutely must be read by anyone who wants to learn about Bitcoin and why Bitcoin matters. 


Some chapters sing out with a compelling bull case for Bitcoin and offer lay readers an excellent rendering of monetary history. In other chapters the author gets bogged down in repetitive economic hand waving, while blaming everything bad about modernity (and I mean *everything* up to and including Miley Cyrus's twerking) on leaving a sound money standard. 

Most reasonable readers--and certainly anyone who's at least ankle deep in learning about Bitcoin--would agree on the value of sound money and the value of holding monetary authorities to a sound money standard.

But for Saifedean the lack of a sound money is a hammer in his hand... and the entire world is a nail. I've found this to be a problem for many Bitcoiners, especially Bitcoin maximalists, hence the often used phrase "Bitcoin solves this" used (only partially tongue in cheek) to address any and all problems of modernity. 

One could describe Ammous' near obsession with "stock to flow ratios" as another hammer, and in this case Bitcoin, or rather Bitcoin's future price, is the nail. There's a problem with using a stock to flow analysis to predict Bitcoin's price, because the halvenings (and when they will occur) are already well-known and well-mapped out, thus likely already incorporated in Bitcoin's price. I don't put much "stock" in this method of valuing Bitcoin. 

But these are minor criticisms compared to the real value of this book: it gives the reader a complete paradigm for how to think about Bitcoin, how to think about money, and how to think about preserving wealth in an imperfect world of loose monetary policy imposed by centralized and highly fallible monetary authorities. 

A few more bullet points: 

1) Excellent discussion of time preference, a very useful concept unfortunately not taught in schools, nor understood by the very people who would most benefit from this ultimate cheat code to life.

2) Keynesianism and monetarism, interestingly, are not much different from the democrat/republican paradigm that falsely divides ideology into two opposing factions (but really one-party rule) of modern pseudo-democracy.

3) Ammous creatively (and justifiably) reframes Keynes's famous maxim "In the long run we are all dead" as a high time preference statement of "libertine irresponsibility." He's right! Only a genuine narcissist wouldn't care about the state of the world after he or she was dead.

4) Intriguing thoughts at the end of the book where the author explores potential applications (or rather lack thereof) of blockchain technology, persuasively arriving at the conclusion that blockchain is a lot less useful than people think it is, except it's extremely useful for the specific application known as Bitcoin.

More Posts

How to Survive and Thrive in the Coming Wave of Deflation by A. Gary Shilling

I'd like to accomplish two things with this review of a book that, frankly, isn't worth a close read. First, I'll briefly point to the specific sections of the book readers can skim to extract most of the book's value--see the next paragraph for that part. Second, I want to use this book--which is the macroeconomic prediction equivalent of a man with a hammer--to expose the "expert prediction" game and illustrate how dangerous it is to credulously follow so-called expert predictions, especially when it comes to stock markets and economics. We'll start with what to skip and skim. A time-constrained reader can extract 99% of the value of the book by skimming parts 3 and 4 (pages 209-331) and studying the two charts on pages 330 and 331, which spell out all the dos and don'ts for surviving deflation. Readers might also consider reading Chapter 15 for its discussion of the Kondratieff wave concept, a useful mental model for thinking about cyclicality in a...

Generative Energy: Restoring the Wholeness of Life by Ray Peat

A disorganized book by a highly-censored medical iconoclast. Despite its sloppiness, it will still send you down a lot of good rabbit holes. I don't recommend a labored, close reading of this book: just use it as an introduction to Ray Peat's dissident health and physiology ideas. In certain ways, we can think of Ray Peat, along with Robert Mendelsohn and Ivan Illich , as direct ancestors of the courageous COVID-era medical dissidents: doctors like Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Pierre Kory, Kirk and Kimberly Milhoan, Paul Marik, Meryl Nass and Peter Gotszche, among others, who bravely spoke out against foolish lockdowns, hospital protocols, government mandates and the use of risky (but of course highly lucrative) therapeutics like Remdesivir--and were censored, suspended or fired for it. [1] As a general rule: in any knowledge domain you should always know who the dissident thinkers are. They are usually the ones who were right all along. [2] [A quick  affiliate link ...

The Congress of Vienna, 1814-1815 by Sir Charles Kingsley Webster

When we study history, we often see clear analogies from one era to another. This book is such an exercise in analogy: it is an analysis of the post-Napoleonic world order used as a specific study tool to grapple with the post-World War I world order. Today's readers can use this book as analogy too, to better understand events in our day. It's excruciatingly obvious that the leadership throughout the entire West is profoundly ignorant of history. And if it's true that those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it, then those of us who do know our history--and can see various analogies and parallels to the past--may well figure out what's going to happen well before they do. I'll explore a few of these analogies in this essay. One immediately visible example is the various interlocking suzerainty/vassalage arrangements in place in any given geopolitical landscape, and how rapidly they can shift when there's a disruption among the dominant states. ...