Skip to main content

Because Internet by Gretchen McCulloch

A linguist explains the history and semiotics of internet communication. While some chapters sing out more than others, this book offers tremendously helpful insights about communication in the post-post-modern era.

Thanks to the internet and texting (and all of the irony, subtext, and various other linguistically subversive nuances one can communicate via those media) modern culture is experiencing what I consider could be the first stages of a hard fork in written communication. An early example might be a concept like Poe's Law, which arose to explain how entire demographics fail to see irony or sarcasm when clearly intended. The growing political bifurcation in the USA seems to be giving rise to noticeable differences in dialectic and language style. 

Even the "language" of Bitcoiners with their rhetorically powerful memes and extensive use of vocabulary designed to be unintelligible to outsiders (e.g.: "few," "gradually, then suddenly," "hodler," US trash token" and so on) gives us a concrete example of how language can signal--and even serve to define--group membership. 

When we've come to the point where the use of an eggplant emoji in the wrong context can be deeply embarrassing, I think it's safe to say that we are starting to see the development of an entire taxonomy of proto-languages online. This book will help you navigate these new frontiers.

More Posts

Hot, Flat and Crowded by Thomas Friedman

I've now read three of Thomas Friedman's books, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, The World Is Flat, and now, Hot, Flat, and Crowded. And Hot Flat and Crowded is--by far--the weakest book of the three. In fact, a cynic might consider it more of a brand extension than a book--a recycling of The World is Flat to include well-meaning and repetitive chapters on energy policy, the environment and global warming. And despite his earnest and palliative writing tone, Friedman's political message has become shrill, and that shrillness debases many of the potentially intriguing ideas and arguments he makes throughout the book. According to Friedman, everything is the Americans' fault. We're supposed to be leaders of the free world, yet we should only act with the consensus blessing of all the rest of the world's countries. We invaded Iraq, which was wrong. We invaded Afghanistan, which was sort of right, but we're making far too many mistakes there. We don't educat...

A Simple Rule for Getting Rid of Your Excess Books

If you read a lot of books like we do, perhaps you share our problem: Our home is gradually getting overrun by books. Piles of them. Sure, we've made resolutions to control the spread of our collection, like "no more buying books!" and "only get books out of the library!" We've tried these approaches, but unfortunately, not only do rules like these suck the fun out of life, they're also ineffective. The thing is, even though we do get most of our books out of the library, and we don't really make a practice of buying books, we somehow still seem to have more books than we know what to do with. And the piles seem to grow, slowly but surely, with every month and year. Earlier this year, however, we adopted a simple strategy to control our book creep, and it has worked so well for us that I decided to share it with you in this blog: For every new book you bring into your home, you must immediately remove two. It doesn't matter whether you donate th...

Money and the Meaning of Life by Jacob Needleman

Disappointing, muddled, and at points unreadable. The book, much of it word salad, becomes increasingly painful and masturbatory throughout. The author  wants  to tell the reader that money isn't grubby or bad per se, that it can and should be used as an instrument of self-discovery, and that when used this way money can be a beautiful, effective and practical tool. But the author doesn't seem to want to say this and be done with it. The reader experiences the same frustrations found in Montaigne's essays: you wish the author would consider getting to the point. Of course, when an author writes well and shares plenty of genuine insight along the way, a meandering journey to "the point" can be a pleasure. But this author is not Montaigne. When an author writes to hear the sound of his own voice, the incentives are all wrong. The reader gets salad instead of insight. Thus a healthy practice here--with all writing in fact--is to go over everything, multiple times, ...