Skip to main content

Free by Chris Anderson

Chris Anderson is an excellent synthesizer of ideas. He's gifted at gathering and regurgitating information*, and he ties this information together with glib and highly readable prose.

After finishing this book, however, I'm left with a dim view of Chris Anderson's thinking. He's an excellent writer, and he has a knack for capturing the latest and trendiest memes of the world of technology. The problem, however, is Free just isn't that insightful.

Many elements of the book are nothing more than diversions from the book's central theme (typical examples: a three-page history of the number zero, a two-page summary of the widely-known story of Gillette and his razor/razor blade pricing model, unnecessary paragraph-long etymologies for everything from the word economics to the word zero, innumerable and laughably liberal quotations from Wikipedia, etc.).

Yes, computing, processing, data storage and data transport costs are all in secular decline. Yes, that makes the sharing of information cheaper and cheaper. This is all obvious groundwork that Anderson already laid down in his previous book, The Long Tail.

And yes, after reading this book, I am now aware of (and have unfortunately dedicated a meaningful portion of my limited mental storage space to) dozens of trivial details about Jell-O, Benjamin Babbit (he was the inventor of the free sample, according to Anderson's Wikipedia regurgitations), the cost structure underlying Ryanair's free air travel (which isn't really free) and some useless generalizations about why $10 per year is the optimal price to charge for a magazine subscription.

Nobody needs another book filled with silly anecdotes, especially when the silliest ones always seem to stick in the mind.

Unfortunately, Free left me with the same impression I had after reading The Long Tail: Anderson's books (at least so far) are simply magazine articles with extra filler. Beyond the trivia and the dozens of largely unrelated anecdotes, there is little insight here.

In short, Free is a decent magazine article turned into a bad book.
*******************
* I've already discussed the plagiarism controversy in Anderson's Free on my writing blog, and I consider it such a painfully obvious example of plagiarism that I won't rehash it in detail here. Suffice it to say that Anderson took text and ideas verbatim from Wikipedia, and when caught, claimed he meant to take ideas from Wikipedia and paraphrase them. Sadly, these are identical crimes of scholarship. Without knowing it, Anderson admitted to being a plagiarist in his attempt to defend himself.

I hope Chris Anderson now has a more nuanced understanding of what, exactly, plagiarism is. Regrettably, it's too late for this book.



Finally, despite the fact that Free was a disappointment, it did yield three titles that I think might be very much worth reading (the fourth book on the list below, Steve Levy's Hackers, I've already read and recommend heartily). Even bad books can yield interesting further reading material.

Reading List for Free:
New Rules for the New Economy by Kevin Kelly
Telecosm: The World After Bandwidth Abundance by George Gilder
Microcosm: The Quantum Revolution in Economics and Technology by George Gilder
Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution by Steven Levy
Labels:

More Posts

The Stress of Life by Hans Selye

Gives a very useful set of lenses for how to think about stress in all its forms and manifestations. The bulk of the book deals with stress in medical biology and human physiology, but there are applications beyond our bodies, to our lives, communities, even among civilizations. A very interesting work.  The chapter "When Scientists Disagree" by itself makes this entire book worth reading. It is an eloquent articulation of the nature of scientific debate (including the implications of when scientific debate turns insulting and hostile), and the author quite humbly provides the reader *all* of the professional disagreements and contentions with his model of stress. This part of the book really sings out with humility, sincerity and a scientific rigor we seems to have lost in the postmodern era. Notes:  * General adaptation syndrome (G.A.S.): how we adapt to stressors: various shock therapies across history (fever treatments, electric shock, etc) provided improvement with n...
Read more

Mary's World by Richard N. Côté [Fourth Turning-style history of the Pringle family of Charleston, SC]

This is a history of a wealthy, well-connected South Carolina plantation family before, during and after experiencing an asteroid-grade event: the Civil War and the North's ensuing multi-year military and economic occupation of the South. The family quickly lost everything, became impoverished to the point of barely having enough to eat, and eventually scattered all over the country and world. They were once one of the richest and most important rice growing families in the entire United States; now no one knows who they are. Still more sad and sobering is how this experience changed the earnest, sincere, well-bred Christian matriarch of this family into an embittered and angry old woman--bickering with her husband, desperate for money, and starting little marmalade-making businesses in her 70s to try to make ends meet. [A quick  affiliate link to readers to the book here . You can support my work here by buying all your Amazon products via any affiliate link from this site, o...
Read more

The Genesis of Russophobia in Great Britain by John H. Gleason

In-depth (and surprisingly interesting!) analysis of the shifting public and government opinion on Russia during late 18th and early/mid 19th century England, plus a useful (and telling) exploration of the various propaganda and media narratives used to drive these opinions. I've written before on this site, many times, that history rhymes, it doesn't repeat exactly, so you have to know your history--and by this I mean know your actual history, not your country's preferred propaganda narrative of history--in order to see that rhyme to make useful, accurate predictions. It is fascinating to see England in the 1800s applying various forms of the same propagandized and manufactured Russophobia that we see in the United States today. England went from a literal  alliance with Russia (against Napoleonic France) to a state of paranoid loathing of Russia in a matter of decades; the USA likewise went from " aren't they our friends now? " after the Soviet collapse to...
Read more