Skip to main content

The Best and the Brightest by David Halberstam

In government it is always easier to go forward with a program that does not work than to stop it altogether and admit failure.
--David Halberstam

The best history books don't just teach you about the past, they also teach you about today.

The Best and the Brightest is a brilliant history of why America failed in Vietnam. It's a history of the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, and it's a history of the lives of the key Cabinet members and agency leaders Kennedy chose--the leaders Johnson later inherited when he unexpectedly became president.

This book is also an exceptionally well-written postmortem of an era when our government made some of the worst decisions in its history.

The title is an ironic reference to Kennedy's Cabinet, which he filled with the best and brightest minds of that era's establishment elites. These were leading intellectuals, captains of industry and key political thinkers of the day. People like McGeorge Bundy, Dean Rusk and Robert McNamara. Leaders who made fortunes in business in America, who were confident to the point of arrogance in American exceptionalism and, unfortunately, oblivious to Southeast Asian history and culture. Our best and brightest. Men full of optimism and self-confidence who assumed that the South Vietnamese actually wanted our protection, and thought that Americans, with their can-do spirit, could once again do what the French could not.

These were the men who made the policies that ultimately mired us in Vietnam. And when Kennedy was assassinated, Johnson, a brilliant domestic legislator who was woefully unsuited for nuanced foreign policy issues, got stuck with Kennedy's Cabinet and their decisions on Vietnam, and because of his lack of political courage, he took us still deeper into the quagmire. It wouldn't be until 1975 before the United States finally got out.

Sam Rayburn, the House Speaker at the time, said it best: "Well, Lyndon, you may be right and they [JFK's Cabinet members] may be every bit as intelligent as you say, but I'd feel a whole lot better about them if just one of them had run for sheriff once."

If you want to hear, at last, a balanced and non-fawning view of the Kennedy presidency, you'll get it in this book. Most peoples' perception of JFK's presidency is sadly limited to a few speeches and a few images from his tragic assassination. After reading this book, you'll have a far more thorough picture of this era in US government history.

And it ain't pretty. It leaves you with the sneaking suspicion that great men don't create history. Rather, history is created in spite of them by the enormous, shapeless bureaucracies that they supposedly lead.

And yet. It always seems so easy to look back on history and claim how obvious the right decisions should have been. It's another thing entirely to make prescriptive and predictive policy when you're right in the middle of events. And there were plenty of reasons supporting US involvement in Vietnam. We had "lost" China to the Communists in 1949. We were still reeling from the red-baiting era of Senator Joe McCarthy. No politician in this era could afford to appear soft on Communism. And Kennedy was badly roughed up by Kruschev in a key summit meeting early on in his term.

It was a widely held belief that Vietnam was the next domino in an entire chain of countries across Asia that would fall to Communism. No one in JFK's administration felt they could afford to let Vietnam fall.

And of course, the thought that a country like Vietnam could stand up to the magnificent power of the American army was dismissed as laughable to these best and brightest.

I never thought it would go on like this. I didn't think these people [the Vietcong] had the capacity to fight this way. If I had thought they could take this punishment and fight this well, I would have thought differently at the start.
--Robert McNamara, in late 1966.

The unexpected bonus today's readers will get from The Best and the Brightest is the book's direct relevance to our era today--both to the Iraq War and to the 2008-2009 mortgage meltdown. Really dumb things get started when the people in power look for what they want to find--whether it's finding evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, finding highly politicized solutions to the mortgage crisis, or finding the key to resisting Communism in a corrupt South Vietnam. You'll see examples of war intelligence massaged to meet the needs of superiors, you'll see Presidents surround themselves with sycophants, and you'll see entire agencies of the government crush every voice of intelligent dissent in their organizations.

By the nature of his office, a President is separated from his natural constituency and from the art of his profession, politics. The office restricts his movements, his access to events and reality, since few want to bring the President bad news.
--David Halberstam

And once policy is set in motion--whether that policy is misguided or not--the wheels of government start turning. Soon those wheels become impossible to stop. This is why terrible things happen whenever a government becomes enamored of its own genius. We saw it with the second Iraq war, and we risk seeing it with the government's various responses to the financial crisis. Let's hope Barack Obama knows his history.

I highly, highly recommend this book.



Suggested Reading List for The Best and the Brightest:
Dean Acheson: Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department
Graham Greene: The Quiet American
Rowland Evans and Robert Novak: Lyndon B. Johnson: The Exercise Of Power
David Halberstam: The Powers That Be
Don Oberdorfer: Tet: The Turning Point in the Vietnam War
Theodore White: The Making Of A President 1964
Lyndon B. Johnson: The Vantage Point: Perspectives of the Presidency

More Posts

How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World by Harry Browne

This book is a praxis: a set of real-world practices for navigating reality as it is, rather than how we wish it to be. The language is clear and direct, and the book aggregates into a highly robust and coherent work of practical, livable philosophy. Author Harry Browne developed this philosophy over the course of many years, and it's inspiring to hear him talk about his mistakes, his refinements in thinking over time, and the surprising and often liberating benefits that came his way as he followed his own practices. This author eats his own cooking, and the result is a generous gift to readers. This does not mean you'll agree with everything the author writes! In fact, Browne encourages readers to disagree with him as we sort out  our specific values, rules and boundaries. He wants volitional readers, not readers looking to be told what to think and do. We'll come back to this idea. [A quick  affiliate link to Amazon  for those readers who would like to support my wor...

The Art of War in the Middle Ages by Charles Oman

A wonderful, information-dense book surveying the evolution of warfare across the Middle Ages, and a glorious starting point for readers to contextualize an enormous amount of European history. There's a great deal of historical knowledge here that author Charles Oman assumes in his readers.  And so the very act of reading this book (and looking up the author's near-constant historical references) equates to a semester or two--at least--of upper-level undergrad European history. Read this book and spend some time looking things up. Then read several more books like this [1].  Pretty soon, enough osmosis happens such that the various battles and historical figures this author mentions casually will be things you start mentioning casually: Cannae, Adrianople, Brunanburh, Hastings, Robert Guiscard, Durazzo, Tours, Crecy, Agincourt, Arnold von Winkelried, Albrecht von Wallenstein, and so on. (This will be an inner monologue of course, because we all know how much every...

Deflation and Liberty by Jorg Guido Hulsmann

In the modern centralized monetary system, all values are inverted. Debt masquerades as money, the system imposes structural inflation and monetary debasement on everyone, and GDP "growth" is increasingly an economic illusion because of that inflation and debasement. Nearly everyone gets fooled into thinking their wages, home values and stock portfolios are "rising"--and this is yet another illusion thanks to the steady debasement of the money. In such a system, anyone living off wage income, who isn't (yet) an asset owner, gets squeezed a little tighter every year. And this is the primary reason we have a so-called K-shaped economy, where asset owners do well, while those living off their labor value don't. It all comes from steady, deliberate monetary debasement. Our author believes this is immoral, and he's right. He believes that the institution behind our monetary system (the US Federal Reserve) is immoral, and he's right. Further, he believes ...