I consider this book a type of a test: a test of a person's intellectual rigor, a test of one's ability to adjust opinions in the face of new information, and a test of one's willingness to engage with information contradicting his or her existing views. If you've been following the various debates on COVID early treatment protocols, or the debates on mRNA vaccine safety/efficacy, you'll already know most of the doctors contributing essays to this book: Dr. Malone, Dr. Nass, Dr. Kory, Dr. Marik and many others. And if you haven't heard of any of these doctors and aren't familiar with their stories, you may need to rethink your information gathering strategies . A few of the most striking themes and topics: 1) Dr. Meryl Nass's story in Chapter 3: if you want to understand the workings of our modern healthcare system, you must understand how the state and national medical board system has evolved into an apparatus for debate suppression and doctor contr
Book Reviews, Reading Lists